No, I just think that he is going to be whipped into shape by Conte and his coaching staff. It’s really not an unreasonable position considering who we have hired.
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
No, I just think that he is going to be whipped into shape by Conte and his coaching staff. It’s really not an unreasonable position considering who we have hired.
Again, drop Kane and see what happens. Kane offers nothing at the moment. I don't know why this is a challenging concept to understand?Yeah that causes him to be unable to trap a ball, lose it constantly when he tries to beat his man, make shit passes constantly .. etc etc. All because he happens to play on the same field as Kane.
Boring excuses for one player, total scapegoating for the other. Which is why I never take any of the shit you say seriously, it's all agenda city.
I think he's mentally checked out mate. Don't think he'll be back to his best, if ever, untill he plays for someone else. Can't see that being City now though.No, I just think that he is going to be whipped into shape by Conte and his coaching staff. It’s really not an unreasonable position considering who we have hired.
Err you seem to be answering questions only you have posed. Kane is not being scapegoated. You asked why his thread had not been bumped YOU then mentioned Kane. Do you not see how contradictory your posts are. So I gave you the reason. Both been poor one has actually won us games this season and not been a source of disharmony. Its no deep conspiracy and pretty logical if you think about it.
Hopefully not with Conte. But based on body language alone until last week, he’s been playing exactly like you describe this season.I think he's mentally checked out mate. Don't think he'll be back to his best, if ever, untill he plays for someone else. Can't see that being City now though.
If Newcastle wanted a marquee signing… is there any chance H would go? They’re probably the only club stupid enough to go close to Levy’s valuation.
I don't think he'd go there tbh. He's not interested in a project at this point he just wants to walk in to a club already set up for some easy winners medals.If Newcastle wanted a marquee signing… is there any chance H would go? They’re probably the only club stupid enough to go close to Levy’s valuation.
Son's got 4 game winners this season butNo there's an obvious reason for this Son didn't disrespect the club and fellow pros whilst trying to force a move. He didn't not acknowledge a win over said club. He had also actually won us games this season. It would be illogical to go after him over the homegrown hero responsible for all of the above.
We kind of do
Bergwijn Son Moura as the front 3
That was the front 3 when we beat Man City and Wolves at the beginning of the season when Kane was on his self imposed excile.
Those 2 games produce 21 shots and 9 shots on target.
He's got 4 game winners this season butDeuterz doesn't think they should count
When Son goes down, we lose to CP 3-0 and draw to an ECL level team even with Kane playing.
When Kane goes down, we beat City and Wolves.
Kane might not be the entire problem, but he sure seems like a significant reason why we're struggling.
Game winners? By your logic Kane has a goal and assist to win a game, and then another assist which won a game as well.
They count but I'm not gonna pretend the Watford and City keepers having blunders = good Son performances. The fact he's done almost nothing since tells me they were flukes. His performances all season have been terrible.
Kane's been shit, if he gets dropped that's fine, but Conte is best placed to make that decision. I fancy he doesn't rate Bergwijn--Son--Lucas any more highly than I do, so won't do it. That'll be 3 managers in a row not rating that attacking lineup just because we fluked 2 wins at the start.
Narrative #7 of the Kane Cult:
Harry Kane has carried shit teammates for years. It's amazing how many goals he's scored against Pacos, Mura and relegation level opposition for years given how bad his teammates have been.
If we play well, win or go to the Champions League final without Kane, it is purely due to luck or a fluke because of how shit his teammates are. If the sample size is over a 3.5+ year span with over 35+ games without Kane, then the statistics are irrelevant and must be disregarded.
![]()
Back to the narrative that if we do anything well without Kane, it's pure luck and just a fluke
You are such a typical joke of a fanboy
HAHA!
I don't think he'd go there tbh. He's not interested in a project at this point he just wants to walk in to a club already set up for some easy winners medals.
Drop Kane and see what happens. It's the only way we'll find out.Yeah okay. In the Son and Lucas threads pretending their individual shit performances (running in to defenders, bad first touches, shit decisions, shit passing) are because of Kane. Does he emit a fucking forcefield which stops Lucas playing Son through?
Just a boring child with a shit agenda which you cling on to. I doubt you even watch games if you think the way those two played had anything to do with Kane today.
Drop Kane and see what happens. It's the only way we'll find out.
21 shots and 9 on target during our first two games under Nuno is much better than what we have going on now.
Conte will sort this out.
We only have 3+ years of data but yes. Keep waiting.I await this game and brilliant performance. Till then, au revoir.