• The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...

    Get involved!

Ex-Spurs Player Harry Kane

Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports

Yeah that causes him to be unable to trap a ball, lose it constantly when he tries to beat his man, make shit passes constantly .. etc etc. All because he happens to play on the same field as Kane.

Boring excuses for one player, total scapegoating for the other. Which is why I never take any of the shit you say seriously, it's all agenda city.
Again, drop Kane and see what happens. Kane offers nothing at the moment. I don't know why this is a challenging concept to understand?

All we can do is look back at past results, isolate the variables and see what the results are:

Against PL Teams Since Last Season w/o Kane Starting

Man City (PL) - 1-0 Win
Wolves (PL) 1-0 Win
Chelsea (EFL) - 1-1 Win on Penalties
Southampton (PL) - 2-1 Win

Chelsea (PL) - 1-0 Loss
Brighton (PL) - 1-0 Loss

4 wins, 2 losses
 
Err you seem to be answering questions only you have posed. Kane is not being scapegoated. You asked why his thread had not been bumped YOU then mentioned Kane. Do you not see how contradictory your posts are. So I gave you the reason. Both been poor one has actually won us games this season and not been a source of disharmony. Its no deep conspiracy and pretty logical if you think about it.

Not even slightly.

I'm not interested in scapegoating Kane because he was a dick or giving Son a pass because a keeper fucked up on a FK and Ederson flapped at a shot early in the season. Both he and Kane have been equally disappointing for a long stretch now. Yet one gets called a 'class above' for very little, or gets excuses made for him whenever he plays badly.

Both our star attackers have been shit this season. The level of analysis on Son appears to be 'Kane's fault' or 'has to be striker as 29 is too old to run' vs 'Fuck kane, scumbag, he's shit now'. I'm not saying it's a deep conspiracy, it's obvious why people are turning on Kane more, I just find it incredibly boring and it leads to shit analysis.
 
If Newcastle wanted a marquee signing… is there any chance H would go? They’re probably the only club stupid enough to go close to Levy’s valuation.

Surely this valuation has changed now..? There's no way Levy is arrogant enough to think clubs are gonna come in with 120/150m bids with this form.

I honestly don't think he would go though. He wants trophies, it's his big thing now. Newcastle aren't winning anything for a long time.
 
No there's an obvious reason for this Son didn't disrespect the club and fellow pros whilst trying to force a move. He didn't not acknowledge a win over said club. He had also actually won us games this season. It would be illogical to go after him over the homegrown hero responsible for all of the above.
Son's got 4 game winners this season but Deuterz Deuterz doesn't think they should count

When Son goes down, we lose to CP 3-0 and draw to an ECL level team even with Kane playing.

When Kane goes down, we beat City and Wolves.

Kane might not be the entire problem, but he sure seems like a significant reason why we're struggling.
 
I think the next 4 games will be critical for him. We’re playing teams who are deep into the bottom half of the table and all of the ship goals. The Kane of old would be scoring a few goals these lot. 4 games to get some wins and some momentum and hopefully have our striker getting back to his best.
 
We kind of do

Bergwijn Son Moura as the front 3

That was the front 3 when we beat Man City and Wolves at the beginning of the season when Kane was on his self imposed excile.

Those 2 games produce 21 shots and 9 shots on target.
Deuterz Deuterz doesn't think 21 shots and 9 shots on target against City and Wolves is currently better than what we're doing.

:mourweird:
 
He's got 4 game winners this season but Deuterz Deuterz doesn't think they should count

When Son goes down, we lose to CP 3-0 and draw to an ECL level team even with Kane playing.

When Kane goes down, we beat City and Wolves.

Kane might not be the entire problem, but he sure seems like a significant reason why we're struggling.

Game winners? By your logic Kane has a goal and assist to win a game, and then another assist which won a game as well.

They count but I'm not gonna pretend the Watford and City keepers having blunders = good Son performances. The fact he's done almost nothing since tells me they were flukes. His performances all season have been terrible.

Kane's been shit, if he gets dropped that's fine, but Conte is best placed to make that decision. I fancy he doesn't rate Bergwijn--Son--Lucas any more highly than I do, so won't do it. That'll be 3 managers in a row not rating that attacking lineup just because we fluked 2 wins at the start.
 
Game winners? By your logic Kane has a goal and assist to win a game, and then another assist which won a game as well.

They count but I'm not gonna pretend the Watford and City keepers having blunders = good Son performances. The fact he's done almost nothing since tells me they were flukes. His performances all season have been terrible.

Kane's been shit, if he gets dropped that's fine, but Conte is best placed to make that decision. I fancy he doesn't rate Bergwijn--Son--Lucas any more highly than I do, so won't do it. That'll be 3 managers in a row not rating that attacking lineup just because we fluked 2 wins at the start.

Back to the narrative that if we do anything well without Kane, it's pure luck and just a fluke

You are such a typical joke of a fanboy

HAHA!

Narrative #7 of the Kane Cult:

Harry Kane has carried shit teammates for years. It's amazing how many goals he's scored against Pacos, Mura and relegation level opposition for years given how bad his teammates have been.

If we play well, win or go to the Champions League final without Kane, it is purely due to luck or a fluke because of how shit his teammates are. If the sample size is over a 3.5+ year span with over 35+ games without Kane, then the statistics are irrelevant and must be disregarded.


:dembelelol:
 
Back to the narrative that if we do anything well without Kane, it's pure luck and just a fluke

You are such a typical joke of a fanboy

HAHA!

Yeah okay. In the Son and Lucas threads pretending their individual shit performances (running in to defenders, bad first touches, shit decisions, shit passing) are because of Kane. Does he emit a fucking forcefield which stops Lucas playing Son through?

Just a boring child with a shit agenda which you cling on to. I doubt you even watch games if you think the way those two played had anything to do with Kane today.
 
Yeah okay. In the Son and Lucas threads pretending their individual shit performances (running in to defenders, bad first touches, shit decisions, shit passing) are because of Kane. Does he emit a fucking forcefield which stops Lucas playing Son through?

Just a boring child with a shit agenda which you cling on to. I doubt you even watch games if you think the way those two played had anything to do with Kane today.
Drop Kane and see what happens. It's the only way we'll find out.

21 shots and 9 on target during our first two games under Nuno is much better than what we have going on now.

Conte will sort this out.
 
I await this game and brilliant performance. Till then, au revoir.
We only have 3+ years of data but yes. Keep waiting.

Since 18/19 season w/o Kane but Son playing 45+ mins

Premier League

12 Wins
2 Draws
5 Losses
*19 matches, 38 points

Champions League
Dortmund (1 leg) - Advance
Man City (x2 legs) - Advance
Ajax (x2 legs) - Advance

Europa League
Lask (1 leg) - Win

FA Cup
Middlesbrough - Advance
Southampton - Advance
 
Back
Top