Again, years ago, so could Greaves. Years ago a lot of people could do a lot of things but he hasn't pressed in years even when the rest were pressing. And he looks like an old man running now. He's not pressing for anyone, anywhere for 90 minutes.Years ago counts because it shows that he can do it.
Nonsense reasoning. We haven't seen me jump the grand canyon but I'm fairly certain we should discount the possibility. What most players can do at 28 is different than what they can do at 21. For most it is not as drastic as the athletic falloff we've seen with Kane. Hell, Benz still runs like a teenager at almost 34. Did you know he was older than Kane? Came as news to me considering how majestically he gets around the pitch compared to our Harry.since we haven't seen him fail at it I am not sure why we should discount it.
Could is some possiblity whereas would is a more-likely-than-not possibility. It was walkback language to soften the assertion on your part...it slightly and almost imperceptibly moves the goalposts and changes the argument. just making note of it.What? He could be successful. He would be successful. Seems like an odd semantics thing to latch on to.
It is the definition of whataboutery. Moura is not germane to the conversation about Kane's merits.There is not whataboutery
Really? I was told that he was more targetman but I've seen some clips that suggest he is, in fact, NOT a big lump. And considering that he IS germane to the Kane convo I will say that he is a shitton more mobile than our English Oak. And would probably be more likely to carry out tactical demands being a young player, moving up a league, and playing for Conte...or just not being a want-away player like our English Oak.Mobile? That is not how I would describe Vlahovic.
sure it does. It means that 96% of the time that our efforts end at Harry Kane's feet this season they are wasted. Oops, I almost forgot. Make the 97% of the time. In case you didn't know that is not very good.The conversion rate means nothing so get whatever useless data you want.
I got a bet. I'm betting that Neal Maupay has a better conversion rate than Harry. And if he does you have to go out and treat yourself to some apple pie in my honor. If Kane's is higher then I promise to make my next purchase of syrup of the imported variety. Deal?
I could say I don't think Van Gogh understood shit about the composition of paint but would that matter when considering his artistic renderings? So yeah, what I saying is...I'm comparing Benz to Van Gogh biatch!!!! Suck it, Iggy!I don't think Benzema understands shit about football or non-football things so his opinion means nothing.