In your very biased opinion. BC rewatched and came to a different opinion. I thought he was off in real-time and wasn't really fussed about the VAR. and it doesn't matter WHY reality isn't coutning it only that it doesn't count.
See, folks of your ilk banging one out over pens is why folks can't see a player for what they really are contributing. There were any of 5 players on the field for us that would have scored that pen. He's just fortunate to be the designated taker. Credit to Sonny for getting it. sonny could have just taken it and we'd more than likely have the same result. the only difference you ask? Welp, I wouldn't be here arguin that Sonny had a great game beacuse he scored a pen...he was rubbish and that would have been the determination with or without that pen. for Kane it is the very basis of your argument and why folks are always caught off-guard when players are finally done (like Dele). they've spent so long denying the reality. Must get tiresome with all the evidence going the other way.
Where we are is that some people like to evaluate the players obejctively and not happy-clap their way into delusion.
Let me ask you this, is where we're we are now a place where folks run to tell us Kane is "back" whenever he scores a goal from open play? Well, if that's true then the converse should also be fair play. right? Could you let us know what position you took from the weekend? Asking for a friend.