Lange and Paratici both suggest players, which one does he listen to?
You're just proving the above point with guess work.
...............We don't know specifically how the work is divided.
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Lange and Paratici both suggest players, which one does he listen to?
Whichever one he believes has made the right suggestion?Lange and Paratici both suggest players, which one does he listen to?
Shouldn't the structure be clear?You're just proving the above point with guess work.
...............We don't know specifically how the work is divided.
To the people within that structure it should and probably is/will be
Whichever one he believes has made the right suggestion?
It feels like you're looking reasons to be negative here - most top clubs have several people at this level on the books, they are all part of the team pulling in the same direction
It's ridiculous, that we have a new DOF and created a new structure but we still have the old DOF who we sacked still hanging around , either the new DOF is up to the task or he isn't.Whichever one he believes has made the right suggestion?
It feels like you're looking reasons to be negative here - most top clubs have several people at this level on the books, they are all part of the team pulling in the same direction
They should be but maybe they aren't as Paratici, isn't officially employed by us.One would suspect the club employees are a lot more clued in than you or I...........
It's ridiculous, that we have a new DOF and created a new structure but we still have the old DOF who we sacked still hanging around , either the new DOF is up to the task or he isn't.
What's that got to do with Paratici hanging around as a consultant?You don't know anything relating to what either persons roles, responsibilities or involvements are within this new structure though
What's that got to do with Paratici hanging around as a consultant?
Because we sacked him for his transfer fraud in italy, also there was a recent report that some in the club were not comfortable with him being a consultant.Because you're dreaming up scenarios in which the two parties are going to clash - why is it a problem that the club is keeping a man who by all reports has a good understanding of talent across Europe in a position where we can still benefit from his input?
Because we sacked him for his transfer fraud in italy, also there was a recent report that some in the club were not comfortable with him being a consultant.
They should be but maybe they aren't as Paratici, isn't officially employed by us.
You asked me a question and I answered it.Not sure what the fraud thing has to do with what is being discussed so far - you've been talking about the structure and how it is (not) going to work, not the fraud.
With an answer not relating to the discussion.
Whichever one he believes has made the right suggestion?
It feels like you're looking reasons to be negative here - most top clubs have several people at this level on the books, they are all part of the team pulling in the same direction
It was your question, so your question was not related to the discussion then?
You still didn't give me a proper answer, I'd be happy to discuss it in the ENIC thread or I can bring the discussion here if you wish.The other day he took one word purposely out of context out of Ange's 20 min press conference and suggested that there's a rift between Ange and Levy and he was indirectly sending shade to the board.
The word happened to be 'if'