I didn't say it was just you that uses the half marks, but it's just you going on and on and on about it.
-
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports
Comparisons of average ratings across 10 selected forum posts, 10 media/ web reports, a combination of the 2 and finally the pure Forum average in the last column.
Vicario..7.75,6.80,7.27,8.16
Porro.....6.50,6.35,6.42,6.84
Romero.8.15,7.30,7.72,8.39
Vdv..........8.50,7.65,8.07,8.93
Davies....5.80,5.15,5.45,5.68
Bissoum.6.50,6.25,6.37,6.63
Sarr..........7.70,7.15,7.42,7.87
Maddis...7.40,7.55,7.47,7.82
Kulu.........6.30,6.05,6.17,6.46
Son..........7.25,7.25,7.25,7.67
Rich.........5.95,5.70,5.82,5.82
Royal.......6.45,6.35,6.40,6.94
Hojbjer.. 6.90,6.20,6.55,7.09
Johnson 6.80,6.70,6.75,7.29
Posto.......7.80....................,8.38
Vicario..7.75,6.80,7.27,8.16
Porro.....6.50,6.35,6.42,6.84
Romero.8.15,7.30,7.72,8.39
Vdv..........8.50,7.65,8.07,8.93
Davies....5.80,5.15,5.45,5.68
Bissoum.6.50,6.25,6.37,6.63
Sarr..........7.70,7.15,7.42,7.87
Maddis...7.40,7.55,7.47,7.82
Kulu.........6.30,6.05,6.17,6.46
Son..........7.25,7.25,7.25,7.67
Rich.........5.95,5.70,5.82,5.82
Royal.......6.45,6.35,6.40,6.94
Hojbjer.. 6.90,6.20,6.55,7.09
Johnson 6.80,6.70,6.75,7.29
Posto.......7.80....................,8.38
So my take from this is that, apart from one or two, the pure forum average is usually only around .5 different from your contrived stats.
Hardly seems worth your effort and aggro.
What about the previous game ? What were the differences for that one like ? . I struggled to find decent quality ratings from the forum for that one. For this match the ratings were better.
Its a comparison exercise from match to match, of course there will be variations on closeness of ratings.
The point people are trying to make for you is that it isn't an exact science. There is no right or wrong.
You score differently to the next person. They score differently to the next person. And so on.
No-one has a problem with you spending your time analysing the stats as you wish. The issue is you declare people's scores as right or wrong.
Cut out the disagrees. Cut out the condescension and all would be good.
This is coming from you, the one who disrespects the thread by giving 10s to all players in all matches.
You expect me to take on board what you are saying ?
I accept its not an exact science but surely its better to strive for quality in the first place. Then a reasonably representative indication of performance is possible. Giving 10s to everyone won't achieve the above...Will it ?
I do that cos you act like a dick.
If you just accepted people's opinions and stopped being so high and mighty, then I'd score properly.
If you just accepted people's opinions and stopped being so high and mighty, then I'd score properly.
Wow you are hard to please. Van de Ven 7, Romero 6.5! The former was a Rolls Royce and without him we wouldn’t have won. Don’t remember him putting a foot wrong
Careful Mat, you ain't allowed to question !!
So you ruin the whole system out of spite towards me and I'm the dick ?
Just read the first page and
The Dealer
has given about 6 disagrees.
Hope he gets a deserved binning and banned from future ratings threads- uber twat.
Hope he gets a deserved binning and banned from future ratings threads- uber twat.
Romero mark sheet.
First half....Poor pass lost ball, good pass, good defending, again, again.
Second half....
good defending, poor pass, good defensive header, good defending, poor defending for goal ( potentially too passive, stood and watched ) , lastly a poor pass.
The goal issue I could be wrong on but he seemed static. But there are a number of negatives in there which challenges the notion he didn't put a foot wrong.
Last edited:
You deserve banning for making such a comment.
I also gave 5 agrees on the first page.
You are allowed to question. You are allowed to debate. What makes you a prick is going round posting disagrees because you belive you are the sole fountain of truth.
Maybe some one should remove his disagree function
Oh I'm undoubtedly a bit of a prick but that's not the discussion here.
You are on ignore, but can’t escape your massive Ego even then.
Read the room, it’s not your forum, it’s not your thread.
Yes I should be binned daring to call you a TWAT.
You’ve been here a few months and first it was derailment (ie everyone else not posting how you want).
IDEA = make your own forum, set the rules, enjoy your own Kingdom.
NOTE : the one other time I clicked “show ignored content” this Douche Bag admitted he hadn’t even watched the game by the stage he was dishing out disagrees = Twat.
Ban this thread ruining cunt.