I didn't say it was just you that uses the half marks, but it's just you going on and on and on about it.Almost everyone uses 0.50s so it's not just my own view ...is it. ?
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
I didn't say it was just you that uses the half marks, but it's just you going on and on and on about it.Almost everyone uses 0.50s so it's not just my own view ...is it. ?
So my take from this is that, apart from one or two, the pure forum average is usually only around .5 different from your contrived stats.Comparisons of average ratings across 10 selected forum posts, 10 media/ web reports, a combination of the 2 and finally the pure Forum average in the last column.
Vicario..7.75,6.80,7.27,8.16
Porro.....6.50,6.35,6.42,6.84
Romero.8.15,7.30,7.72,8.39
Vdv..........8.50,7.65,8.07,8.93
Davies....5.80,5.15,5.45,5.68
Bissoum.6.50,6.25,6.37,6.63
Sarr..........7.70,7.15,7.42,7.87
Maddis...7.40,7.55,7.47,7.82
Kulu.........6.30,6.05,6.17,6.46
Son..........7.25,7.25,7.25,7.67
Rich.........5.95,5.70,5.82,5.82
Royal.......6.45,6.35,6.40,6.94
Hojbjer.. 6.90,6.20,6.55,7.09
Johnson 6.80,6.70,6.75,7.29
Posto.......7.80....................,8.38
So my take from this is that, apart from one or two, the pure forum average is usually only around .5 different from your contrived stats.
Hardly seems worth your effort and aggro.
The point people are trying to make for you is that it isn't an exact science. There is no right or wrong.What about the previous game ? What were the differences for that one like ? . I struggled to find decent quality ratings from the forum for that one. For this match the ratings were better.
Its a comparison exercise from match to match, of course there will be variations on closeness of ratings.
The point people are trying to make for you is that it isn't an exact science. There is no right or wrong.
You score differently to the next person. They score differently to the next person. And so on.
No-one has a problem with you spending your time analysing the stats as you wish. The issue is you declare people's scores as right or wrong.
Cut out the disagrees. Cut out the condescension and all would be good.
Wow you are hard to please. Van de Ven 7, Romero 6.5! The former was a Rolls Royce and without him we wouldn’t have won. Don’t remember him putting a foot wrongPostecoglou: 8
Vicario: 7
Royal: 5
Porro: 5.5
Romero: 6.5
Davies: 3
van de Ven: 7
Højbjerg: 6.5
Sarr: 7.5
Bissouma: 6
Maddison: 7
Bentancur: 4
Son: 7
Richarlison: 6
Kulusevski: 5.5
Johnson: 6
Gil: 4
Submit your ratings | View match averages | View season averages
Wow you are hard to please. Van de Ven 7, Romero 6.5! The former was a Rolls Royce and without him we wouldn’t have won. Don’t remember him putting a foot wrong
I do that cos you act like a dick.
If you just accepted people's opinions and stopped being so high and mighty, then I'd score properly.
Wow you are hard to please. Van de Ven 7, Romero 6.5! The former was a Rolls Royce and without him we wouldn’t have won. Don’t remember him putting a foot wrong
Just read the first page and The Dealer has given about 6 disagrees.
Hope he gets a deserved binning and banned from future ratings threads- uber twat.
You are allowed to question. You are allowed to debate. What makes you a prick is going round posting disagrees because you belive you are the sole fountain of truth.Careful Mat, you ain't allowed to question !!
Maybe some one should remove his disagree functionRomero mark sheet.
First half....Poor pass lost ball, good pass, good defending, again, again.
Second half....
good defending, poor pass, good defensive header, good defending, poor defending for goal ( potentially too passive, stood and watched ) , lastly a poor pass.
The goal issue I could be wrong on but he seemed static. But there are a number of negatives in there which challenges the notion he didn't put a foot wrong.
Oh I'm undoubtedly a bit of a prick but that's not the discussion here.So you ruin the whole system out of spite towards me and I'm the dick ?
You are on ignore, but can’t escape your massive Ego even then.You deserve banning for making such a comment.
Ban this thread ruining cunt.You deserve banning for making such a comment.