If a 10 game sample at the beginning of his journey here justifies more than a calendar year of mid-table stuff he has been serving since then, guys like Glasner who had similar spells with the likes of Palace should forever be immune to sacking. Don't think anybody would argue in favor of this kind of reasoning
I fail to see how he's different than the likes of Ten Hag. Looks like we're just delaying the inevitable like they did for months
I fail to see how he's different than the likes of Ten Hag. Looks like we're just delaying the inevitable like they did for months