Again, I ask, post the original.
No one can.
Again, I ask, why is the tick not blue showing it's an official account?
-
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Player James Maddison
- Thread starter The Fighting Cock
- Start date
Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports
No one can.
Again, I ask, why is the tick not blue showing it's an official account?
White tick on stories.
In which case, we now have to hope he isn't banned for our last 2 games for calling cheats cheats.
Knowing us..
A proper captain talks about these things, as do good managers and the hierarchy.
Ridicules that the club have been so silent. It's like being complicit in many respects.
Cowards at the top filters down.
It's him. His official IG. Madders is his official IG handle.
Yes, that's right.
Have no doubt.
Madders is the ballsy one. Fuck whatever FA wanna punish him. They will just prove how corrupted and dirty they all and PGMOL are.
TBH it's not just us being poor , it's all football , even before you factor in the poor officiating the game has become boring .
I honestly think I would have seen barely a handful of games this season where I thought that was a great game of football . None of this tappy , tappy back and forth whilst there is 9 players in a low block , and don't get me started on corners and freekicks around the box , all this grappling and pulling and interfering with the GK , it's all bullshit .
I know I'm old school , but it's just not enjoyable football .
Going for a walk .
So are we saying this decision was either corrupt to help an already safe Leeds , or corrupt to help West Ham stay up at our expense. Pretty sure the Prem have no desire to see us relegated , that makes zero sense .It's him. His official IG. Madders is his official IG handle.
Yes, that's right.
Have no doubt.
Madders is the ballsy one. Fuck whatever FA wanna punish him. They will just prove how corrupted and dirty they all and PGMOL are.
This corruption malarkey does not stand up to scrutiny imho, makes us look pathetic .
EDIT: All clubs have some fans who think this , kind of proves it’s bollocks
The way this season is going, someone high up and powerful in the league office is an Woolwich fan and just wants to see Spurs in chaos.
Every decision awarded for Woolwich. Everything against us.
That’s a more likely theory than just corruption.
You figured it out yet?
So this shadowy figure has refs and VAR officials all in on it . Over the course of a season loads of different refs and VAR officials have all agreed to conspire help this Bond villain out .
Sorry I’m not buying it , incompetent and weak yes , Blofeld no imho
Should have been a red.
Question was if it should have been a foul though
The rules are that even if you win the ball, it's still a foul if the follow through is excessive/dangerous.
Winning the ball is not a shield for a foul/red card.
Unless you're a wankstain of a ref/VAR.
What the Maddison one raises is "what actually constitutes winning the ball"
Leeds player 100% did not win the ball. It was still there for Maddison had he not been fouled.
There's probably nothing in the rules that defines that, which they can hide behind.
The question then is, who does this have to happen to, before the rules are subsequently defined and changed?
United, Liverpool or Woolwich probably.
Winning the ball is not a shield for a foul/red card.
Unless you're a wankstain of a ref/VAR.
What the Maddison one raises is "what actually constitutes winning the ball"
Leeds player 100% did not win the ball. It was still there for Maddison had he not been fouled.
There's probably nothing in the rules that defines that, which they can hide behind.
The question then is, who does this have to happen to, before the rules are subsequently defined and changed?
United, Liverpool or Woolwich probably.
Mate of mine has an interesting theory:
- VAR was introduced after years of small teams complaining about being robbed
- Powers that be made sure that VAR was flawed from the off, and refs briefed to fuck it up on purpose
- Now even the most fervent VAR lovers want it gone
- Authorities will eventually scrap it by popular demand
- Refs can go back to screwing smaller teams without 20 replays to show how corrupt they are
Exactly. I used to ref. And the key difference between me and most (almost all really) people commenting on games I was involved in, was that I had actually read the rules and their interpretation. Several times.
It is as staggering as it is laughable how many people in football think they know the laws of the game without having read them.
Hey, the 1970s called and said it touched the ball, and can it have it's ball back, while you nurse your broken ankle. Play on, he touched it!!!