Lol but when you watch the team play who seems to play better / have a more positive effect on the game, Dier, Tripps or CE?
Also surely big goals and assists count for more than standard shot accuracy, cross accuracy stats.... given, those actually directly affect the course of the game...
It depends doesnt it. Eriksen didnt have any effect against Dortmund until Poch told him to drop deeper and collect the ball of the CBs......but why couldnt he work that out for himself for 35 minutes?
He's as much a passenger as the next man when we are under the kosh, and for a player who is so lauded, I dont see him as the lynchpin or catalyst that decides enough is enough, and just turns into the puppet master, like a Pirlo or Modric can.
Too inconsistent to be anywhere near that bracket, yet spoken of as if he is, so I judge him as such. A player who could "walk into" any team on the planet...I dont see it.
Big goals and assists count of course.....but a higher accuracy % of shots and crosses means more goals doesnt it, which helps makes seeing out games more comfortable, than charging the Alamo until the 94th minute every week.
Wonderful in his stride, but rarely for a whole game, and never, ever, for 3,4,5,6 games on the spin.
Also heard this new mantra about him missing Kane and Dele. No, not buying that.
A top player should stand out amongst lesser players, not revert. Put Messi alongside Ronaldo, he wont stand out as much as he would alongside Danny Drinkwater right?
If Eriksen needs Kane and Dele, to look good, then maybe its Kane and Dele that look good.