Ange is probably leaving the club at the end of the season, I mean it could be true but then again it could not be...
-
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports
Ange is probably leaving the club at the end of the season, I mean it could be true but then again it could not be...
Ange is probably leaving the club at the end of the season, I mean it could be true but then again it could not be...
Exactly.
Given Mr Levy's history, a few more bad results and the rumours about Ange on the hotseat will be very much within his character and recent track record.
So voted at the Premier League meeting today, that clubs (which really means Newcastle, maybe Man City with Girona, Palace and Sheffield Utd with their "feeder teams") CAN sign players on loan from "associated clubs" this window. PL clubs missed out by one vote on getting it banned.
So Ruben Neves to Newcastle could certainly happen from Jan 1 if all parties wanted it.
So Ruben Neves to Newcastle could certainly happen from Jan 1 if all parties wanted it.
Last edited:
Was just about to post this.....
Arse
Brentford
Brighton
C.Palace
Man City
N.Forest
Newcastle
Sheff U.
W.Ham
+ Chavs (and their dodgy ownership lineage)
All have ownership links to other clubs.
The necessary 14 team majority was never gonna happen; even though the big clubs (highlighted) are far more likely to abuse it to significant benefit whilst the benefit to smaller clubs will be nominal.
More license to cheat from the PL then.
What makes you say that?
Clubs have had their vote; why would they revisit the same matter in the summer?
Nevez will prob make a perm move to NC for 20 quid at that point anyway.
Because the Prem were in favour of shutting it down, the only reason why it's going ahead is because the majority clubs voted for it but I don't expect them to allow them to vote going forward...for example they already took away the voting for Semi Automated offsides for VAR in which the majority of teams didn't want and the Prem are brining it in next season.
If the EPL wanted to shut it down then why hold a vote at all? ......If the prem are holding votes and reversing the verdicts then it's hard to imagine the clubs taking kindly to that.
Rhetorical questions.... I don't expect you to have the answer and you could well be proved right in time anyway.....
Premier League as an organisation don't have that option. Every rule is voted on by the clubs.
They have not railroaded through semi-automated VAR, it is on the agenda for voting by clubs in March next year. And revisiting the rule that got rejected today will need some changes for it to get through, if they want to get it in force for next season.
Last edited:
Blatant I'm Daniel Levy post.
Newcastle cleared to sign players from PIF-owned Saudi clubs
Newcastle United will be permitted to sign players on loan from sides also controlled by their Saudi owners in January following a Premier League clubs' vote.
www.bbc.co.uk
I’m getting sick of this bullshit. What’s the fucking point? Seriously? We’re a fucking joke, just a whore country full of simps.
Who will be their Klopp or Guardiola??
Any up and coming managers out there stand out as being someone they can give a 5 year project to?
Or will they just go down the old Chelsea route of changing manager every two years and keep everyone on their toes with constant change?
Any up and coming managers out there stand out as being someone they can give a 5 year project to?
Or will they just go down the old Chelsea route of changing manager every two years and keep everyone on their toes with constant change?
what I was talking about with easy target Everton, English league is a disgraceful league. You don't need to be the worlds greatest detective to see how this can be exploited badly. The super rich Saudi league that has no FFP restrictions who can sign players on mega money and then loan them out to their parent club Newcastle
shouldnt be up for a vote, it should be hard rule, but newcastle loans should now be closely scrutinised
shouldnt be up for a vote, it should be hard rule, but newcastle loans should now be closely scrutinised
Last edited:
I know, but it's the rumours that boiled piss. City getting a way past his prime Lampard is not the same as getting Neves.
Anyway it's all moot because the league voted for it.
If we're going to get into the habit of letting rumours upset us, we're in for a pretty upsetting time.
For what it's worth I do think there should be rules against shifting around FFP regulations by moving players between parent and feeder clubs. And had this rule been already in place, I'd not have too many complaints.
It's the timing of the vote that reeks of protectionism from some of the 'Big 6'.
I don’t really understand this vote. Surely the only team that could benefit would be Newcastle? They could get Neves, Benzema, a couple of others. Are Man City really going to loan players from Girona or Melbourne?
Seems to me the only club that isn’t at the top of the club ownership totem pole is the Geordies, so why are other clubs making it easy for them?
Seems to me the only club that isn’t at the top of the club ownership totem pole is the Geordies, so why are other clubs making it easy for them?
Everton's prospective new owners have a few other clubs, and were Man City in a position where they needed quick reinforcements on the cheap, they could pull from their feeder clubs. Same is true for Chelsea, et al.