The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
LOL - what?Its true then
Or someone is broke and looking for a golden pay-outAny chance they were somehow suppressing them or knew they were coming?
Seems slightly odd to me that all of these stories have only materialized after he's left Real Madrid
Any chance they were somehow suppressing them or knew they were coming?
I think you are giving Madrid too much credit.I don't think they could have actively suppressed them. But given the timing of it just before his move there they were probably aware of the allegation and the settlement, and given the #MeToo stuff with so many of these cases becoming public after years they may well have guessed this would happen.
Seems slightly odd to me that all of these stories have only materialized after he's left Real Madrid
Any chance they were somehow suppressing them or knew they were coming?
that has gone out of the windoow since weinstein and me too
apart from the ones that the rozzers are having to have another look at cos they held back evidence as part of the disclosure process.It really isn’t. In the court of public opinion, perhaps, but not in actual real court
I’m not quite following ... that’s a good thing isn’t it?apart from the ones that the rozzers are having to have another look at cos they held back evidence as part of the disclosure process.
Like OJ Simpson?we have now had a couple of cases where there was no conviction in a criminal court but success in a civil court. I find that kinda scary
the fact that the rozzers were FORCED to go back and look at cases because a couple collapsed due to a lack discloure is not a good thing: They shouldn't be withholding evidence in the first place.I’m not quite following ... that’s a good thing isn’t it?
Or am I misunderstanding your point?
Like OJ Simpson?
I don’t know anything about that. Perhaps you can cite the cases & let’s take a look. The criminal justice system sometimes fail us & if evidence can be presented to, & some kind of justice served in, civil court then it’s better than nothing
Suffice to say it doesn’t scare me in the slightest, again as per your 1st paragraph actually quite the opposite
It is no longer the son of the pharaoh after the sale of Real Madrid. He thinks he was expelled in CL and seems to have become DogmanI think you are giving Madrid too much credit.
that has gone out of the windoow since weinstein and me too
I'll explain it better. They are reporting crimes to CR7. I don’t know how true the violence in Las Vegas is. What is clear is that everything came out after the departure from Real Madrid (and the fact happened in 2009, the summer of the transition from Manchester United to Real Madrid). Yet the Me Too is from October 2017: 1 year ago.What?
TBH I haven't followed the case that closely, my first and maybe wrong assumption, was akin to yours.Her waiving her right to anonymity makes me suspicious of the claim, I'm not sure if that's shitty victim-blaming culture that makes me a bad person or what - but that's my honest gut reaction.
I can only think of 2 reasons a rape victim would want to not remain anonymous. 1 is they believe the authorities are botching/burying the investigation and want to be in the public eye putting pressure on the case to move forward in an honest manner (which doesn't seem to be the case as LVPD seems to be going about this case in a thorough and careful manner). The other, obviously, is the attention that such notoriety brings and the ability to spin that into personal gain.
Apparently there was an agreement and he paid her off, so there had to be something there. But then, cynically and possibly making me a terrible person again, she's a model whose professional value is directly tied to the ability to attract attention in the public forum...what better way to get publicity?
I dunno, its fucked up. Could definitely see Ronaldo being guilty, but could also easily see this being a similar sort of case to Kobe's. And can see the motive for him to just pay her to avoid the attention originally, $350k is probably 1 day's income or less to him (including endorsements).
If someone said they were going to accuse a person of an act they knew would be difficult and greatly inconvenient to defend themselves from if they didn't give cough up a couple hundred bucks, a lot of peolle probably just hand them the money to go the fuck away. Especially if that person's livelihood is strong derivative of public opinion of them.
This is the problem with #MeToo and social media justice system. Being accused is very damaging, in it's own, and there's really no skin in the game for many false accusers.