The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Kneejerk aside - they extended Fellaini's contract until 2018 (Jose seems to like him, as baffling as it seems) - so where would Dier even play? If anyone from the Top 6 - City desperately need a good holding mid (and a new back 4 essentially)Red top bollox and everyone goes into meltdown.
United must be smugly pissing themselves laughing...
We are no longer a selling club, we are moving in to the next level, one paper rumour and it's chicken little time. West Ham behaviour.
I didn't think anyone still believed the bullshit after the last 12 months we've been subjected to
Does that leave us weaker or stronger? Does it leave Utd weaker or stronger?Sell Dier if he wants to go and get Rashford.
Does that leave us weaker or stronger? Does it leave Utd weaker or stronger?
I suspect weaker for Q1 and stronger for Q2. It's a bad trade in my view.
I remember when Williams was dominating F1. He gave an interview, the exact details of which I can't recall, but the essence was that a tiny advantage can turn a race into a procession. Apply that thinking to the EPL.
Despite the large difference in points total last year, the gaps in quality between the main title challengers are relatively small. This, coupled with inexplicable swings (Chelsea 50pts 2015/16 - 93pts 2016/17; Leicester 81pts - 44pts) means that the last thing we should be doing is giving a direct competitor the opportunity to gain even the smallest advantage over us.
Yes I agree, but if the player wants to leave?
If the decision was mine, I guess I'd have to try to weight up the relative risk associated with keeping an unhappy player with a lower future re-sell value against selling and taking the profit now.Yes I agree, but if the player wants to leave?
If the decision was mine, I guess I'd have to try to weight up the relative risk associated with keeping an unhappy player with a lower future re-sell value against selling and taking the profit now.
Would, for example, the likelihood of our missing out on the title or CL qualification to Utd next season be increased if we sell Dier to them? What's the opportunity cost to us if that happens? Is the profit we'd make on an immediate sale greater than the possible losses we'd incur by not winning or qualifying? Could we reinvest the profit immediately to ensure Utd don't gain that small advantage over us they might otherwise gain?
I know this line of thinking focusses primarily on the financial rather that sporting side of things, but only because that's what I imaging the club would focus on when weighing up its options.
Good job I'm not paid to make these decisions, eh?
Flashbacks of Carrick in 2006.
Difference being that Dier is actually a United fan. The gap has obviously shortened between us and Utd in that 11 years though so I'd like to think Dier, who's still young, will be willing to stay.
He wouldn't knowThis is nothing like the same as Carrick though.
So here's how the Guardian know Dier is now open to a move to United...
"Dier, who admitted in 2010 while at Sporting Lisbon that it would be difficult to turn down United if the chance came to join the club he supported as a boy"
Only Eriksen played more minutes than Dier last season, he was out injured for 2 or 3 games at the beginning of the season too.Funny that the story tries to give itself legs by saying Dier isnt first choice....funny, cos the last time I checked he´s vital to our best formation.
The press have mugged themselves off over Kane, Walker and Poch, so now its Dier