You mean because she explained why the calls were correct and not the way you wanted them?
I can find it all annoying regardless of the speak and spell manner in which the rules are explained.
Ange, Wright, Keane and the presenter all found it perplexing - they must all be thinking exactly the same - they must all have secretly wanted Denmark to win. Is that what you mean?
One day you'll get your wish and we won't have refs at all, just an AI computer giving instant decisions.
I believe football is never black and white and I don't think the technology is good enough yet to be giving these kind of decisions.
If you know anything about frame rates and a general mathematics of speed Vs 25 frames per second, you realise that these calls that give someone onside or offside by a toenail are all just shams and actually bollocks guesswork based on the technology available to them.
There's a reason why the 100 metres olympic final has 1000 frames per second cameras to decide a dead heat.
So sorry - the decisions aren't as right as you think.
And I think it's your own emotions that are closing your judgement - I couldn't give a fuck who won out of Germany v Denmark. Just don't like the way a really good match was killed off by a (to me at least) bollocks decision.
But as I said earlier - you think the Sissoko decision in the Champions League Final was a clear cut deserved penalty whereas I don't.
The rules say it was - I just don't like the rules.
Don't worry, England are going out way before we'd meet any of these two teams anyway.