I'm not retracting anything, I said he flogged all of our goal threats, that was poor wording on two fronts, the first that it implies he sold them when in reality 2 were ended loans that he simply didn't replace (I also said Lamela "sort of" as he wasn't a prolific scorer as such, but an attacking option still).
The second error was that I meant back ups, as selling all of our goal threats would have included Kane and Son too, which obviously didn't happen.
He replaced the 3 with Gil, who I like, but who has provided nothing as of right now no matter how good he may become.
So his dealings have left the squad in a poor state in an attacking sense, you can disagree if you like but the actual stats back this up.
I don't think I ever said anything about his first window being mixed? The sole piece of business that people point to in his favour is Romero, it's generous to claim this as a success given he's probably played almost as many minutes for Argentina as Spurs this season. It'd probably be just as fair to put him in the same boat as Gil, potentially good but nothing proven so far.
Mixed might actually be a generous appraisal of his work, for the here and now anyway.
Regardless, I believe my initial point was that his reputation based on being on the phone a lot and being awake a lot wasn't going to last for long when considered alongside his actual outputs of weakening our attacking options, spunking a load on Emerson, and installing Nuno to bring us attacking football.
Now if you like, you can continue to argue over some poor initial wording, or, you could demonstrate to me which of the bolded points aren't true?