I hate them with a passion and even more so since monday but Chelscums new kit is very nice.. Proper old school with the pattern in the lining, FUCK i hate myself for liking it.
to myself
Has to be nice at £100
-
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports
Has to be nice at £100
What is this £100 quote for the Chav kit I keep seeing? Is that the price for the actual match worn style shirt?
Yeah I think it was £101 with name and number on the back. Just saw a headline somewhere
Just obscene.
Mr Chairman you're missing a trick....
The UA match worn shirts were about £90, cannot seem to buy them anymore.
Stupid Chavvy wankers, Roman obviously trying to fleece those odious toads of a following, to cover the losses he's making in gas supply.
...pretty much like every cunt who will be wearing it then!
That rumoured Chelsea shirt price thing is bollocks. They're doing pretty much what we've done in the past. Charging normal price for a replica, and then charging more for the 'authentic' version that's the same as the players wear
Chelsea defend £90 cost of 'authentic' new home kit for 2016-17
Every couple of years the press latch on to these things, like they do with England shirts. They go for the shock tactic, and totally ignore the replica being the usual price that all teams charge.
Chelsea defend £90 cost of 'authentic' new home kit for 2016-17
Every couple of years the press latch on to these things, like they do with England shirts. They go for the shock tactic, and totally ignore the replica being the usual price that all teams charge.
I think they let themselves down with those subtle logos all over the shirt though - reminds me of pyjamas.
Wouldn't particularly want a Spurs shirt with cocks all over it.
Bang on. That upper-tier price is for the ones identical to the player shirts (something I've noticed Nike to be doing for a while now, so expect a Spurs equivalent in a year's time).
If someone wants to pay more for that, then I don't see why not - if there's a market...
Shortsleeve mens home shirts will be £55 (without customisation), exactly the same as ours.
Though I'm mainly pissed off about the Chelsea price because I initially fell for the clickbait.
:chadliblow:
I think they let themselves down with those subtle logos all over the shirt though - reminds me of pyjamas.
Wouldn't particularly want a Spurs shirt with cocks all over it.
Bang on. That upper-tier price is for the ones identical to the player shirts (something I've noticed Nike to be doing for a while now, so expect a Spurs equivalent in a year's time).
If someone wants to pay more for that, then I don't see why not - if there's a market...
Shortsleeve mens home shirts will be £55 (without customisation), exactly the same as ours.
Though I'm mainly pissed off about the Chelsea price because I initially fell for the clickbait.
:chadliblow:
You used to be able to by the 'authentic' UA player shirts, although the club stopped doing them. I remember you could get the first UA kit in that form. Don't have a problem with them selling those as they have all the compression and technical nonsense built in. Although how many fat football supporters would actually wear those for sporting endeavours?
Funny thing is: a fan might spend all that money on getting an 'authentic' kit designed for performance, having PL badges and a player name put on it - but I never jog in one of my proper Spurs shirts because the number on the back rubs.
Funny thing is: a fan might spend all that money on getting an 'authentic' kit designed for performance, having PL badges and a player name put on it - but I never jog in one of my proper Spurs shirts because the number on the back rubs.
Are the names and numbers stitched on rather than printed?
As much as we whine about the red AIA, it looks nowhere near as awful as Chevy's mark on the Man U kits.
I don't have a problem with this.
I agree it looks awful, but Utd's rivals don't play in gold.
Cheski's new kit is annoyingly nice.