Funny cause Liverpool fans are complaining that they won't "SIGN A FU**ING CB" etc
maybe all boards are frugal with their money eh.
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Funny cause Liverpool fans are complaining that they won't "SIGN A FU**ING CB" etc
You're the one missing the point. When the fuck did i say i can get the manager sacked?? I said the board can sack the manager (and they will do)Your missing the point. You can't get the manager sacked & I can't get the board sacked. We are powerless.
You keep asking me to tell you how I plan to do something I can't. Despite you not being able to do yours either.
Anyway. No point going around in circles!
True. Very happy with our stadium, finance, corporate side etc. But the football side is the major problem. They seem to be getting worse at this.Fair point, especially on their recruitment.
They are run on similar lines to us, i.e. self sustainable.
The difference is their recruitment is so much better, albeit on a bigger budget.
Who says our board goes back and say these are your options? We don’t know what goes on being closed doors but we know we are not a rich club.LFC's board appointed Klopp.
LFC's board sanctioned world record fees for goalkeeper and defender for the specific players that their manager wanted, they didn't go back and say no, but we will give you a list of these much cheaper alternatives.
Well just looking at the teams above us, Leicester and Liverpool both have better.
We both know city & Chelsea aren't as frugal.Funny cause Liverpool fans are complaining that they won't "SIGN A FU**ING CB" etc
maybe all boards are frugal with their money eh.
Because you said how are you going to get the board sacked. So surely that has to apply to sack the manager too.You're the one missing the point. When the fuck did i say i can get the manager sacked?? I said the board can sack the manager (and they will do)
I'm saying anyone who says sack the board is wasting their time because they can't say how or when this can happen? Nobody can 'sack the board'. It can't happen so it's fucking pointless to say that's what we should do. Unless you can explain how it can be done.
We both know city & Chelsea aren't as frugal.
Anyway, I am sure Liverpool fans are much happier than us even if they want a new CB. I am sure a CL & league title helps. All fans want new signings. I think you're deluded if you think our board has done a better job than Liverpools. But each to their own.
Leicester have good recruiters sure...
they've also sold Kante. Marhez, Maguire etc.
I'm sure our fans would love levy if he sold our best assets and gambled on guys like Fofana, Ndidi (who okay have worked but don't pretend people would still lose their nut and call us a selling club. Leicester had one season in the CL and fell away massively after they won the league.
Grass isn't always greener.
Selling Bale, Modric, Berbatov etc. must be a false memory I have then.
Of course a club of Leicester's means is going to have to sell their best assets when they get a top offer in, but they are back above us on half the turnover, they reinvest, don't take 100m profits.
They are without doubt performing better as a club based on their means than us, due to their board, policies and recruitment.
You basically said cannot include Chelsea and Man City because of their money power, but in effect our money power in relation to Leicester is the same as Chelsea/City to us.
You can't have it both ways.
So you do think Liverpools board have done a better job?I'm not saying that, I'm say that all fans give out about their boards even United. etc
Liverpool have have an excellent manager - they've also signed Klavan and Ketia, Lovren etc
Levy's not perfect but people who think he's worse than Ashley and the likes are worse? Come on.
What £100m profits did the board take ?Selling Bale, Modric, Berbatov etc. must be a false memory I have then.
Of course a club of Leicester's means is going to have to sell their best assets when they get a top offer in, but they are back above us on half the turnover, they reinvest, don't take 100m profits.
They are without doubt performing better as a club based on their means than us, due to their board, policies and recruitment.
You basically said cannot include Chelsea and Man City because of their money power, but in effect our money power in relation to Leicester is the same as Chelsea/City to us.
You can't have it both ways.
We bought reguillon yes and I think hd is quality, loaned bale and that's a good job too. Its a shame I hoped he still had it in him but clearly not.perhaps but our midfield and attack are fine, only our defence has issues in terms of player available. This is not equivalent to Poch during the 18 month barron spell. We bought Regulion, Bale, PEH, Doherty, Rodon, Vinnie, easily our best ever transfer window.
Have they...we spent barely 70 million, which in elite football is one quality player for most big teams...Aint got much of a problem with the board, they've delivered the stadium and have started to loosen the purse strings now we're in.
Chelsea cunt in the dugout has to go though
Of course they have, thats undeniable.