The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
And someone who plays good football tooI think he would get a period of goodwill from the supporters... he was great for them back in the day... but the players will be another challenge altogether. I think they’d take some convincing. He was decent as the Colchester and Norwich boss for a very short time. But I also think Celtic should go for someone bigger. They need a statement to reassert their authority in Glasgow.
Big fan you are
No I'm not a big fan of Rangers or Celtic to be honest. However as this is the 'Scottish Football' thread I didn't see anything wrong with my post?Should have been a question mark
Celtic fans are pissed off.
Both of the old firm clubs run on this model. Sell a value asset (player or manager) every few years to balance the books.Rumours rangers will have to get rid of players having overspent to stop the 10 in a row and cant afford to keep it up.
Not when that club has claimed to be null and void by themselves. They themselves said they were a new team, new business to avoid paying a 30 mill debt.The whole 9-years-old is a stupid argument tbf. The liquidation and formation of a new corporation does not erase the connection. Clubs are more like nations in that regard, would you say Russia didn’t win WW2 as it was the USSR of France as it was the third republic?
There’s a relation of succession between them.
+ cherry pick the best players from the minions as is the rest of Scottish football keep them in their place thus keeping Rangers & Celtic at the top if over the years Dundee Utd, Hibernian, Hearts & Aberdeen had been allowed to keep and develop their best players each of them might have had a chance of a challenge for the league.Both of the old firm clubs run on this model. Sell a value asset (player or manager) every few years to balance the books.
If you take player sales since 2014 (Celtic £97m, Rangers £6m) then Rangers are operating more within their means. Both clubs run at a loss last season which was affected by COVID (Celtic £22.6m, Rangers £16.3m). But if either team can qualify for the champions League group stage (worth €15-30m plus TV revenue fees) that'd be a massive game changer. No need to sell a big asset and the added draw of CL football.
It's not true either.Its not lies in fairness
Happens in every league, unless strict wage and number of player limits are brought it, it will continue to happen. Scottish clubs had their chance over the past decade to try and step and fill the void left by Rangers demotion, no team could do it. What that did was allow Celtic to be come poorer and still walk the league and cups every season this the entire standard of the league dropped. Unfortunately due to the existing fan bases and world wide interest in the old firm nobody will compete without serious external investment.+ cherry pick the best players from the minions as is the rest of Scottish football keep them in their place thus keeping Rangers & Celtic at the top if over the years Dundee Utd, Hibernian, Hearts & Aberdeen had been allowed to keep and develop their best players each of them might have had a chance of a challenge for the league.
It's not true either.
Yeah happens in Spain,Germany etc and Scotland other teams can’t sustain a realistic challenge due to financial restraints the two biggest supported clubs arguably are Hearts & Hibs one was unjustly relegated and are languishing in the league below the other as per usual comes out of the blocks at a great pace then goes pear shaped and runs out of steam.Happens in every league, unless strict wage and number of player limits are brought it, it will continue to happen. Scottish clubs had their chance over the past decade to try and step and fill the void left by Rangers demotion, no team could do it. What that did was allow Celtic to be come poorer and still walk the league and cups every season this the entire standard of the league dropped. Unfortunately due to the existing fan bases and world wide interest in the old firm nobody will compete without serious external investment.
Not a hopeAgree that's a good price, I think I'd rather spend the £15m on Morelos though if there was a choice.
Doesn't get much bigger for Celtic than LambertI think he would get a period of goodwill from the supporters... he was great for them back in the day... but the players will be another challenge altogether. I think they’d take some convincing. He was decent as the Colchester and Norwich boss for a very short time. But I also think Celtic should go for someone bigger. They need a statement to reassert their authority in Glasgow.
Do you honestly think he is good enough? I'm not sure.
From the Rangers side? Not sure any are that exciting. Ryan Kent is pretty good but I think we have plenty of that kind of talent.looks good from whenever I have seen him but I guess a gamble but the price might be good. Who would you go for?