Very much disagree.SorryNabil Bentaleb
I actually think most decisions Levy has made regarding management have been good ones.
Poch has worked out spectacularly well, and is 10/10 so far. I count as poor or meh almost all the other interventions or managerial decisions he's made since taking over. With the exception of getting Harry in (panic buy if ever there was one), I'd say they've all been poor.
Firing Raincoat 2 weeks before FA semi (Jeez, even if we win the final, you can still fire him in the Summer, you know the fans hate him);
Not firing Hoddle at the end of his 2nd season, the last half of which had been an absolute shit show. Clear to everyone he'd completely lost it;
Relying on a caretaker, Pleat, for almost the whole of the next season;
Santini FFS. 6 months to identify someone, and he lasts 6 weeks (?) ;
Ramos - no experience in the PL. Complete gamble on someone whose success in Spain was massively down to a brilliant DoF with outstanding scouting ability. Due diligence should have picked this up;
Harry - don't fire someone unless you KNOW you've got someone better lined up. We didn't. I don't care whether he "deserved" to go for taking his eye off the ball. Talk about cutting off noses to spite. Ergo keep him another season surely and take that year to identify someone better for the long term;
AVB - a disaster in the PL before us. Typical Levy signing - cheap as no fee to be paid (Chavs paid up his contact in full, £13m I gather);
Tictacs TImmy - actually did OK for most of the season. But again, it sacked off the season because he's not a long term option.
Levy's got some major pluses - steady financials; great training ground; brand new stadium (fingers crossed); he's backed alot of the managers with transfer funds. But the manager is the 2nd most important person at the club. It's Levy's job to get it right and 80% of the time his judgement has been really poor.