romero gil and gollini is a good start tbf
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
They would get a £3 meal deal on Ryan NelsenImagine Paraciti and Redknapp together wheeling and dealing
Think you got me wrong mate because I accept he wants to leave as he wants to win things which is not happening at Spurs.You make it sound like it’s a bad thing
if he’s going, let’s spend stealthily and smartly before the Kane transfer fee is announced and an extra £10M is added to the buy price of everyone we enquire about
Who would Gil replace in our first 11 - FatBerg?romero gil and gollini is a good start tbf
Immediately, although I cannot guarantee calling it a fucking piece of shit was not the fix. Try both to be safeHow long did you wait before turning it back on?
hoping we get neto too, fatberg needs his ajax moveWho would Gil replace in our first 11 - FatBerg?
FFS grow upWho would Gil replace in our first 11 - FatBerg?
Gilberg replacing FatbergWho would Gil replace in our first 11 - FatBerg?
He won’t even play 3 games next seasonWe've got one bench warmer on loan so far folks. Let's not have a wankfest
Neto and Traorehoping we get neto too, fatberg needs his ajax move
If we move on enough players we could manage another decent CB signing. I'm already sold on Paratici.
With how much better Traore got under Nuno, I'd rather we got Sarr from WatfordNeto and Traore
Yes it is. Especially with extending Son and possibly selling more dead weight like Sissoko and Winks.romero gil and gollini is a good start tbf
Quality player, coukd be world classWith how much better Traore got under Nuno, I'd rather we got Sarr from Watford
We should have been making this sort of bet more often under Poch (buy players, wins stuff to pay for them) and we never really did.
The amount of money we make from getting into the Champions League, combined with the sort of players that we would be in position to attract, as well as the sponsorship opportunities, would make up for selling Kane for £70m rather than £120m.
That's the thing, though. We wait for them to prove themselves in another league, by which time they're in the tens of millions, instead of low single digits. We need to go after them before they prove themselves. If even 1 out of 4 work out, we still come out ahead.I would differentiate between Isak & Vlahovic compared to Hlozek.
La Liga and Serie A are definitely much closer in quality to PL than the Czech league. Although of course there's a risk that they won't adjust like Soldado.
Hence I'd ideally want 2 promising young strikers as a replacement for Kane. Vlahovic is a must, but Isak may be much harder to prise away.
I'd way for Hlozek to prove himself at a better league first, as we already have a very young prospect in Scarlett.
Levy would have been lynched for selling Eriksen. he was a wonderful payer for us and we back to being deemed a "selling club" where "Levy only cares about money" Levy clearly didn't want to lose Eriksen and we fans were the same.We spent money but bought badly, no top class players bought, just medicocre - Sissoko, Aurier et al - so never improved the squad.
We could have sold Eriksen for £80m + .... but waited too long and sold him for a fraction of that amount, but based upon our buying from 2015-2019 it would'nt have made much difference, just more mediocre players bought with Eriksen's fee to move on now,
scarletts our hlozek we need isak or vlahovic moreThat's the thing, though. We wait for them to prove themselves in another league, by which time they're in the tens of millions, instead of low single digits. We need to go after them before they prove themselves. If even 1 out of 4 work out, we still come out ahead.