We already need to shift 9 players and bring in 6 this summer.
In no world are we also trying to sell Johnson and Kulu as well mate
-
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports
We already need to shift 9 players and bring in 6 this summer.
In no world are we also trying to sell Johnson and Kulu as well mate
Would make sense. Good player for smaller outlay as long as you don’t have an issue with wages.
Mad thing is most Spurs fans would see Guirassy as a cheap option and the club not being ambitious but probably if we did sign him it would have been because we actually competed with big clubs to get him.
Ok then definitely better
I only said Trossard because the self hate crew love to have massive crywanks about Trosssard and CHO is a totally different level of talent. If he gets consistent as he matures, he’s a player with the ability to start for any team in the prem.
Pleased I could give you a chuckle.
The argument is that spending doesn't guarantee anything.
It doesn't.
Oh God
You can just picture Daniel Levy right now, can't you
Edit: you can see why he'd be happy to have big Ange out of the way in Germany for the month as he sniffs around a potential Forest fire sale
Last edited:
10p and a pack of crisps for Gibbs-White.
Cheeky bid for Murillo?
Oh God
You can just picture Daniel Levy right now, can't you
Edit: you can see why he'd be happy to have big Ange out if the way in Germany for the month as he sniffs around a potential Forest fire sale
Like a chav in TK Maxx on JSA day
We won't. But selling one of them - preferably Johnson - is what a ruthless and ambitious club would do. We cant expect to compete for anything next year if we have 80m worth of sub par RW back ups on the bench.
Issue is we'll be competing on wages, which Levy historically never likes to do.
That will be our issue with any and every top player as long as we are under Levynomics.
True. But equally, wage bill is the most accurate predictor of league position. It's no surprise we have routinely finished 5th-6th these past 5 years given that's where we place in the wage bill league too.
I know Levy likes his precious wage:revenue ratio low but if we're going to win trophies at some point we're going to have to start competing on wages with the top clubs in the league.
So that’s gibbs white and Hudson odoi coming in 100% then
Haha well credit for having the balls to put this in writing I guess.
Woah, i'm stunned with the Forest news that we're heavily linked with Hudson-Odoi and Gibbs White. Stunned i tells ya.
So next year we'll be starting the entire Forest 2023 front three and fans will be shocked when Big Agnes is sacked with the club in Forest's 2023 league position.
The concept of "first choice" is what exactly?
a) The first name linked to us in a position
b) The 5th name linked to us in a position but in the eyes of the fans is better than the other 4
c) Were linked with the player in previous windows
d) Is the most expensive out of the other players were are linked with
The answer is none of these. No one knows who is the "first choice" target for a position (unless it directly comes from the lips of the manager). Everything is framed around what's been pushed in the press and then how fans choice to filter that info.