You didn't need to though. Everything you wrote about Sarr is correct, you only brought Johnson into it because you don't like him.I was using the defence used by some people for Johnson to say why Sarr then should be afforded the same leeway.
There are very few who don't see what Sarr brings, and the potential he has. You don't see that with Johnson, and that's your prerogative, but he's only a year older than Sarr, with his own potential for growth and improvement. Forget the price tag, he's not responsible for that.
All I'm saying is that if you are prepared to show patience towards Sarr, then how about you extend that towards Johnson?