Here we go. If you can't answer a simple question, create a new question.
We were talking about our team and dropping Eriksen from it. We don't have the option to drop Eriksen and replace him with Sane, Hazard or Mane. Also, they are also all forwards. So when discussing who we drop from our side, it's a stupidly bogus argument on every level.
I've compared him to his peers, several times, you just keep ignoring it, I have told you nobody in this league has created more chances in the last three and a half years (or the last time I checked anyway, either way he's in the top 1-3 in this league for chances created) in the same time I'm pretty sure his 47 assists is also more than anyone else's.
All his peers go through phases of being less than stellar, but like him, their meh is invariably better than shit players "good", which is why players like Eriksen and his peers are rarely ever dropped, which is probably why over the last 3 and a half seasons only Lloris has played more minutes for this team.
You were saying he should be dropped because of his form, or because "he's shit".
So on that basis, I ask you again, if he's form is bad and he's shit, he's still giving this team much, much more than Sissoko, who is also an attacking midfielder, who's been dropped back into an 8 type remit, tasked with transitioning the ball, so why would you drop Eriksen, but leave Sissoko in your team?
Just answer this simple question?