The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
His dead ball kicking was always spectacular in training, very rarely managed it in games, especially big games, for us.his corner taking and free kick taking yesterday was so much better than ive seen when he was at Tottenham....
Must be coaching?
Then please carry on and explain why of 3% of corners result in goals if it absolutely matters?If the ball doesn’t come into the box it’s impossible to score from a corner. Having a corner not even make it past the first man absolutely does matter.
When 3% of corners result in goals, it's not just Eriksen then is it!?I appreciate what Eriksen has given us over the years, but his corners weren't good enough. Toby has been dangerous on attacking set-pieces, but without the service it's impossible to score
Do you know what percentage of corners that don't beat the first man result in goals?Then please carry on and explain why of 3% of corners result in goals if it absolutely matters?
If the ball is put "into the mixer" it's defended but it beat the first man so it looks better. I wonder why teams play a short corner, perhaps they are just taking the piss out of everyone?
What does it matter when only 3% of ALL corners (that's, short, front post, back post, pulled back, put into the mixer, fizzed, lobbed, lofted) result in a goal?Do you know what percentage of corners that don't beat the first man result in goals?
When 3% of corners result in goals, it's not just Eriksen then is it!?
Who is a good corner taker, what makes them so and back it up with stats to prove it.
It matters because 3% is a fair bit better than 0%, with that kind of attitude why not just turn it over for a goal kick then, because, you know, only a 3% chance of scoring...What does it matter when only 3% of ALL corners (that's, short, front post, back post, pulled back, put into the mixer, fizzed, lobbed, lofted) result in a goal?
I can't recall if the article written by Michael Caley broke that specific down or not (it now appears to be behind a paywall, I'm sure I've posted it on here when it was first written but the search function hasn't identified it but here it is: https://www.washingtonpost.com/gdpr-consent/?next_url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fancy-stats/wp/2014/06/17/what-is-a-corner-kick-worth-in-soccer/ ). I do recall another specific stat from it though and that was the opposition score from 0.5% of the opponent's own corner from counter-attacks.
There is this from the Guardian In defence of the corner, a much-maligned set piece | Gregg Bakowski and these two previews from Pat Nevin Nevin: Why have corners got worse? Why teams gamble on defending corners which were also put out to defend the corner taker.
The 3% includes near post. So again there really isn't any massive gain to be had.I don’t know who’s got the best deliveries. Someone like James Ward Prowse maybe, and you are probably right, Southampton don’t score a lot on corners. Still though, if the ball doesn’t reach the area you don’t even get part of the 3%.
One Eriksen corner that did reach a teammate saw us win against Wolves in the dying minutes.
How many goals has Kane scored from corners?It matters because 3% is a fair bit better than 0%, with that kind of attitude why not just turn it over for a goal kick then, because, you know, only a 3% chance of scoring...
You know last season Harry Kane had a 16% goals to shots conversion rate, should he have not bothered shooting because there was only a 16% likelihood of scoring?
At what % does something become worthwhile for you?
The 3% includes near post. So again there really isn't any massive gain to be had.
How did he play last night?Fair enough if you haven’t been disappointed with our corners, I know for sure I have.
Only made it worse that Eriksen had the best crossing abilities in our squad. No one in our current group are whipping in crosses between the last defender and goalkeeper, which are so difficult to defend.
The 3% includes near post. So again there really isn't any massive gain to be had.
He made Insigne look shiteHow did he play last night?
How did he play last night?
How did he play last night?
And Toby, Jan & Dier never scored from a near-post corner in their lives I suppose?Unfortunately, Eriksen's corners did not even reach the near post for us.
Yeah I’m sure David Beckham thought to himself ‘Na no point in putting these corners in the box’ when they were 1-0 down to Bayern with 3 minutes leftThen please carry on and explain why of 3% of corners result in goals if it absolutely matters?
If the ball is put "into the mixer" it's defended but it beat the first man so it looks better. I wonder why teams play a short corner, perhaps they are just taking the piss out of everyone?