seemed to be going for the ball
there were a lot more malicious tackles in the match
"Going for the ball" alone doesn't count for much.......
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
seemed to be going for the ball
there were a lot more malicious tackles in the match
......balls.seemed to be going for the ball
No idea how this wasn't a card of some sort
Sorry. Can't agree. He's a a boring, unimaginative plodder which is part of the problem that we've had for a few years. Boring and totally non creative midfield. I'm hoping Conte is able to fire up Dobby. Or buy someone like Adama.Hes been great for us when he came. One of the few highlights of last season.
USA?What third world country?
Great country. The best neurosurgeons in the world.Ireland a third world country?! are you one of those lads with a Union Jack in your twitter handle? Ireland is Richer per-capita than England.
educate yourself before throwing out meek racial slurs.
Wuthering Heights??Whatever, it hardly requires an Enigma machine to decipher the code.
It's an area in which we could get a whole lot more creative
Kinda like Iceland where you play Ponzi until it fails and guess what? The rich get richer and the poor say "good luck to the lad"Ireland a third world country?! are you one of those lads with a Union Jack in your twitter handle? Ireland is Richer per-capita than England.
educate yourself before throwing out meek racial slurs.
It is. A response to a question but off topic.Err slightly off topic?
What? I don't understand. It wasn't Attwell, he wasn't there at all, that's the whole point. (Or maybe you're making a joke and I'm being thick and missing it :/ ).The irony being Attwel gave them a penalty that was over ruled by VAR, he booked Holgate and that was upgraded to a red by VAR.
Not sure what he did in our favour tbh.
May be I'm missing something. I assumed the songs were about Attwell giving us favours and assumed he was reffing.What? I don't understand. It wasn't Attwell, he wasn't there at all, that's the whole point. (Or maybe you're making a joke and I'm being thick and missing it :/ ).
Perhaps you meant a supposed "Attwell" (in quotes) rather than just Attwell... :/
Whole thing was hilarious anyway.
May be I'm missing something. I assumed the songs were about Attwell giving us favours and assumed he was reffing.
If not the case I've got no fucking idiea what's happening.
...Gray fluffed an easy redirect chance from 8 yards out at 81:21...We had 4 decent chances, Royal header. Reguilon volley. Davies long ranger. GLC off the post.
Any/all of those on target they were going in, keeper had no chance. Everton had not one single chance of that calibre.
I’ve convinced myself that Emerson’s header was potentially on target and we should have had at least a corner as it may have come off Grays arm.But it still hits the frame of the goal.... which IS the target, whether it has more spin/and or a deflection to help it go in is missing the point. If the keeper misses it, and it hits the post, how is he to know it WON'T bounce in... He doesn't know the trajectory or spin on the ball, only the direction... If it beats the keeper and goes IN Off the post OR bounces away, it has already beaten the keeper to hit the target... The rest is up to physics!
A shot that HITS the frame of the goal IS a shot on target, surely? That's whY the keeper is there, to protect his goal: net AND frame!
...and if so, then the 0 shots on target stat was wrong yesterday!
As someone already said, a daisy cutter at a snails' pace that Hugo picks up blindfolded and doesn't particularly bother anyone DOES count a s a shot on target (and adds to the all important Monday morning Opta/xG co-efficient FIFA Pro stats) ...yet a shot that strikes the post of the FRAME of the TARGET, giving us ALL that brief moment of "it's in", doesn't count as a shot on target just 'cos it bounces out?
I feel like Annie Wilkes in Misery.... Am I the only cock a doody person that can SEE THIS?
s'a bit weird, thass all!
It was rhetorical but I take your point.Because we signed these players to contracts and teams aren’t exactly queuing up to give them a pay raise.
Aye, so ye did, son