Was Charlie Kane an agent prior to handling his brother,or was something he took after harry got big?
-
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports
5 quid last minute job on ebay innit.
Yea was just a joke really...
I suspect the only other name he's ever had on his books was Ali Dia.
Admire your optimism but call me negative all you want, we are both fans so our views are somewhat rose-tinted.
Let's use an independent opinion..betting odds. A quick look at bookie odds for top 4 have us at 4 or 5 / 1. So a 20% chance. I wouldn't therefore be as confident as to say we "will" get top 4, given there's a far greater probability that we won't.
If I were to be particularly forceful, I'd also say that Levy must be laughing looking at fans who think we will get top 4 with the current squad as that is all ENIC are aiming for, so no need to strengthen the squad further.
City, Liverpool, Chelsea and United all have superior squads to ourselves. Leicester you could make a strong case for being stronger, with bookies giving them a slight edge. We are seen as on a par with Woolwich, who are a shambles. That, I think, tells you all you need to know
I still think Levy is a bald wanker and it’s his fault we are in this mess, but I also feel he’s well within his rights to keep Kane at all costs unless a seriously ridiculous offer comes in. He’s on a 3 year contract and he is irreplaceable. If City are not serious and are trying to lowball us with ridiculous 100 mil offers, then they can kindly fuck off. Kane will have to do some grovelling, but at the end of the day we will forgive and forget. I don’t want him going city.
I'm one of these many supporters
Completely agree with you about your complete post
Doesn't happen often!
:nunothumbs:
There's about 75 million reasons why not. The fee he went for was way beyond our budget.
They didn't overlap at SCBC
I heard different reports last week about which day Kane was due back. However it was the Cunts at Sky that blew this all up but if the story about him not expected is true then why the fuck did not Kane put the story right to save all this hate towards him. Kane seems to know how to leak stories to the press and yet it was allowed to fester and doubt it has achieved anything.
Bad things get said on here , didn’t you know & everyone judges others it’s a fact of life . I’m sure you’ve said worse , in fact you have on here about other posters .
Neither seem particularly bright
It would give everyone clarification about n what he wants to do.
Maybe he wants to cause resentment? Maybe he feels this would help him get his move.Who knows what goes throught these players heads?
Put right what? What is the truth? As far as I can see, he didn't show up for training on time and didn't tell the club either. He leaked the story to the press himself. He even told his England teammates he was not going to show up.
With which part? The poster states no figure as to what an acceptable offer would be. A lowball offer is merely subjective.
Letting a player of Harry's ability rot in the reserves is criminal. I wouldn't "gladly" ever agree with that.
I think we did OK with the Bale money, especially if you factor in comparisons other football clubs with success vs failure in signings. I am always irked at how Spurs are always seen as not signing the right players whilst I cast my eyes over Liverpool and Chelsea and Woolwich all have had more failures than successes than us. The fact that Chelsea can sign who they want when they want, pay fortunes for them in addition to offer huge salaries, yet most all turn out to be spectacular failures yet the talk is always on the rare few that are good. (of the Bale 7 only Chiriches and Paulinho were shit. With Capoue not fitting in. All the others moved the team forwards and we were better. Chadli would have stayed if his Belgium place wasn't in doubt, in hindsight I think he was wrong to move and was a good enough squad/league cup/Europa league player (still turning out for Belgium even now!).
We were 5 points off 4th last year!!! If Nuno had Wolves twice finishing 7th straight out of the Championship I think we will be pushing for the top 4 again. City, Chavs is way ahead, with Utd for 3rd although Ole is going to have to come up with the more varied style of playing with the squad available to him, their basic approach to games will find him out I think. Leicester really isn't any better than us, squad wise, they were just better managed. LFC is an odd one, they are a well-drilled team, but ageing fast can the new signings replace the old, are the old still motivated. They have Klopp, who is a world-class manager, no doubt but. Watched Woolich pre-season game against Chavs the other day, and without Chavs doing anything special they should have gone into the half at least 4 nil up. Woolwich look just toothless as they've always done under Artetta and just as shite at the back!
TDLR: 4th spot is wide open and like last year it will be fought over by us, Leicester, Woolwich and Liverpool, with obviously Liverpool the better placed side to achieve it.
But I'm 100% not crying if we sell Kane as I think we look slow and one-paced with him (and still acknowledging his brilliance) but that was possibly down to how the Dinosaur set us up. If Nuno has us playing better quicker football, playing more as a unit with proper fluid automated attacks then I think we can "sell" the Club to a higher quality of player. Let's not forgot that Kane wanted to leave whilst the Dinosaur was here, despite all the bullshit of being a WiNNeR, he wanted out having seen the dino for what he was.