The use of the Bale money suggests otherwise.
-
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Latest Spurs videos from Sky Sports
100 m plus Laporte and Jesus and I’m in.
Last edited:
Who is Paul Keefe?
In the post-COVID environment, then absolutely yes.
Every team is going to have issues in selling players this year, be they top players and getting the valuation they should be prior to COVID (Kane is a typical example of this) or fringe players that are under contract on relatively high wages that other clubs might not be able to afford the wages (transfer fee wouldn't be the issue, wages would be an issue).
City one of just a tiny, tiny handful of Clubs that can navigate their way around all of this of course but this doesn't mean that they would want to keep players like Silva, Mendy on their books if a) they are never played b) couldn't sell to another Club outside of the PL (wouldn't sell to PSG/Madrid/Barca/Bayern who are rivals to CL), so doesn't leave many other options.
Also, we were a direct threat to them when we enquired about Sancho, we aren't now.
Our biggest issue isn't about players in or out, it's about what players in or out. It could be DoF has this covered, right now as a fan it's hard to know if this is the case. So, what I see from us fans point of view is what is our DoF's identity for Spurs to play like, so we could all lust after Silva or whoever, but if he's not a player that fits the profile of the squad we are looking to build it's pointless being offered him or us as fans getting excited about player 'x'. We are all a bit blind just now, amplified by not having a coach in which we can say this guy plays a defined style.
Literally none of those players would come to us
Not really sure, highly followed on twitter. Primary function is to dismiss rumours I believe
Fabrizio is only relaying the details of what the offer is mate.
That's wishful thinking. I think if that would be the case (highly unlikely), we'd settle for 60-70M + those 2.
That was 8 years ago and we weren't in the supposedly precarious financial position we are in at the moment.
Sorry but he gets overly excited and piggybacks onto things.. then U-turns when it is horsecrap (usually Paul O Keefe telling him that)
He's still a helmet.
9 goals from 29 League apps this season, within one of Europe's most creative teams isn't really a strong selling point IMO.
Not saying he's shit, plus he's still young but Vinicius scored only 4 goals less than him in total this season and did so playing in a low-block Tottenham managed by Pullis on steroids and played 20 TWENTY fewer games!!! Pass.
Fuck that.
All our debt is long-term..... Loss of revenue is by far the more pressing issue.
Time to report City for tapping up amazing how the total figure bid is exactly the same as the figure Harry said in his interview with Gary Neville. They have made an illegal approach and I question when it was they deserve a transfer ban.
People can not have closely watched him he is a poorer defender than Jesus is a forward.
As much as I would love that to happen... but the ship for all things fair and just in football has long since sailed and then sunk.
Nobody is stopping money any more.