Mourinho has always eschewed such automatisation, preferring to condition players to make the right decision in any circumstance rather than trying to pre-empt those situations.
FML.
FML.
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
It is surely going down a slippery path giving this man money to spend. Think about it. It will take years to rectify and start playing our game. The Tottenham way.Wow.
I mean I agree with every word but its brutal isnt it?
The thought if him wasting 200 million in the summer knowing how we dont spend money feels me with dread.
Interesting take. In what ways do you feel the article was lazy? And are you talking the 1+1=2 way or 'slow day at the office' way you say at the end?Makes a few good points but quite a lazy article, really. Dull and full of cliches - nothing happening so why not whack out an anti-Mourinho article, eh?
Wilson's book on Eastern European football is a good read though.
Are the Tottenham players still training regularly while Premier League matches are suspended?
I doubt it. A few days ago they were one of the only teams still doing it but now it doesn't seem so.
I hope somebody padlocked the fridge for a certain player.
The goals we concede are not on the manager but on the players, setup and strategy yes.Interesting take. In what ways do you feel the article was lazy? And are you talking the 1+1=2 way or 'slow day at the office' way you say at the end?
Sissoko doesn't excel at anything.
Interesting take. In what ways do you feel the article was lazy? And are you talking the 1+1=2 way or 'slow day at the office' way you say at the end?
If something is accurate/correct (ie it jibes with the evidence/observations) then surely it is persuasive, no? And to what situational specifics are you referring? Pre or post injuries to Kane and Sonny?Just think it's a slow day at the office (or rather, the focus isn't on football RN) and JW has dug out a few tropes from his previous Mourinho stuff. Long-ball, hasn't evolved, buses etc. Not saying he's wrong but it's not a persuasive read - doesn't take into account the specifics of our situation.
I see they have written a response to me as well but I was not interested in their opinion/response. I can work things out for myself on the matters they were addressing (from my cursory glance) in their post. I was specifically interested in a more detailed response from the person that wrote this:Edit: I see fruityloopie @fruityloopie several posts above has done a sterling job answering your query, so I'll leave it there.
I was interested in why you felt it was 'lazy' (you've now expounded ie slow day) and why it was 'dull' and what the 'cliches' are (not further addressed but what's dull and cliched to one is not the same to all). The post and opinion of fruityloopie , irrespective of how 'sterling' it may be, was of little interest to me because it doesn't address my question which was why you felt that way.Makes a few good points but quite a lazy article, really. Dull and full of cliches - nothing happening so why not whack out an anti-Mourinho article, eh?