Wondering if
Ossie Wembley
sings "he's magic you know..."
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Wondering if Ossie Wembley sings "he's magic you know..."
That is a super easy question here *
Return of capital comes from the fact that the selling price is higher than the purchase price. There are basically two types of investments - those that you expect to earn you a constant cash flow (and you can basically keep them for unlimited time - in terms of stockmarket those are dividend stocks; in RE those are condos or business RE units with good tenants) and then there are investments where you expect to sell for more than you paid for them (usually held for limited time, in stock market so called "growth stocks" ; in RE such objects that you buy, renovate/make better and then sell on).
I can clearly see that investment into our club falls into latter, so it is absolutely logical that there is no money taken out of the club. So really you are the one claiming otherwise, and you are one with burdain of proof that it is like you say it is.
* maybe not for everyone, but I have BA in finance and have worked in finance for few years now
If you read the Stadium thread a few weeks back, the club/ connected companies owned by ENIC have bought up lots of land around WHL and intend developing it no doubt at a profit. They dare not lose control of the Football club in case the new owners decided to object to some of their plans. I cannot see a sale for several years as they will make money from these developments.If you haven’t picked up on this then you clearly haven’t been paying attention. But please answer answer me this, if an investment consortium headed by individual with doesn’t actually even like football, doesn’t extract revenue from a club where will they see a return on their capital? What is their motive for owning the club?
But Pochettinho takes it seriously and we have got to 2 semi finals.
2018/2019
Round 4: Crystal Palace 2 Spurs 0
Round 3: Tranmere 0 Spurs 7
2017/18. FA cup:
Semi Final: Spurs 1 Manchester United 2
Quarter: Swansea 0 Spurs 3
Round 5 Spurs 6 Rochdale 1
Round 5. Rochdale 2 Spurs 2
Round 4. Spurs 2 Newport 0
Round 4. Newport 1 Spurs 1
Round 3 Spurs 3. Wimbledon 0
2016/17 FA Cup
Semi Final: Spurs 2 Chelsea 4
Round 6 Spurs 6 Milwall 0
Round 5. Fulham 0 Spurs 3
Round 4 Spurs 4 Wycombe 3
Round 3 Spurs 2 Aston Villa 0
2016/15 FA Cup
Round 5. Spurs 0 Crystal Palace 1
Round 4 Colchester 1 Spurs 4
Round 3 Leicester 0 Spurs 2
Round 3 Spurs 2 Leicester 2
2014/15 FA Cup
Round 4. Spurs 1 Leicester 2
Round 3 Spurs 4 Burnley 2
Round 3 Burnley 1 Spurs 1
He's a bit more a fan of the Johnny Cash version of 'Hurt' and that's when we win.
If you read the Stadium thread a few weeks back, the club/ connected companies owned by ENIC have bought up lots of land around WHL and intend developing it no doubt at a profit. They dare not lose control of the Football club in case the new owners decided to object to some of their plans. I cannot see a sale for several years as they will make money from these developments.
The only thing I agree with you on is how some players didn't play a part in these games, whereby the same players played nearly a full 90 minutes in games where we were 3-0 up, 4-0 up etc over the Christmas period. Eriksen for example played far more minutes than he needed to and I believe & did wrote this at the time that he couldn't have at least been on the bench for this years knockout defeat.
Apart from that I'm sticking with the belief that the Champions League and Premier League prioritising is at present in the best interests of the club ahead of prioritising a cup run ahead of them. Money is crucial if we don't want to Finns ourselves closer to the situation Wenger found himself in having to let go of 20+ players to clubs like Barcelona, Man City & Man United in order to balance the clubs books. I highly doubt an FA Cup win wouldn't have made it feasible to pay Kane his £200k per week, Dele his £150k per week etc
Where as you are an ABBA Money, money money fan. The open top Bus parade with the balance sheet - turnover up by 30%. What a time to be alive.
Wenger lets them then go because those players because they largely botched their contract negotiations and becuae they wanted to join bigger clubs - we are just as equally as vulnerable as them when it comes to the latter.
And no i didn’t think you would give up your CL belief - that’s what happens when the money men in pursuit of profitability and television networks hawking their tv packages peddle the notion that is the only way to the elite.
No I just don't share your view, which is infinitely depressing. I accept we've made progress and that silverware is still some way off, you think Poch isn't good enough.
I don't care about the turnover, I care that the club will continue for another 136 years without going bankrupt, they seem to be doing the right things to enable that. It's not about bus parades, it's about existing and surviving, those are not the mediocre ambitions you might think they are when you look at the history of the game and this club.
Tottenham Hotspur can't be what you want it to be, how you want to square that circle is up to you.
Silverware is still some way off when we have players like Kane, Ali, Son, Eriksen to name a few - it really says it all.
As for going bankrupt - Jesus wept, we are one of the richest clubs in the world outside of the elite. It’s not just going to happen certainly not under the model we are run.
As for Tottenham Hotspur not being what I want it to be - you’re right. This is a club whose history has been defined by the likes of the FA Cup, UEFA cup and league cup and there will never be a circumstance where we should believe we have higher priorities than that. It’s really telling of the modern game where the person who defends this clubs history, who respects its traditions is seen as the villain of the piece.
Wondering if Ossie Wembley sings "he's magic you know..."
Surely the FA should be able to hear what Dean had to say, as refs wear microphones now. If Poch and Jesus were rightly provoked, then surely there must be a charge against Dean, as well.
If he has said ANYTHING out of order and along the lines of the suggestions, that would make it appear that he is not impartial towards us and has abused his power. Simply, he should go and an example should be made of him.You would hope, what's the odds that the mike 'failed' or had accidentally been 'turned off' just before the event. I'm sure Spurs will have requested the conversation as part of their mitigation defence, but if Poch doesn't contest the charges, and he has said he won't, then no doubt a deal will be done with the FA and anything Dean said will be hushed up. There's no upside (apart from for us fans) in the club making Dean look the utter cunt we all know he is, that will just come back to hurt us over and over, we get enough bad decisions already.
Something must have been said for Poch to react the way he did. Especially when they were asking 'what did you say?'Rumours going round Twitter are that Mike Dean said
"Don't blame me for the loss, you bottled it"
Now it's only Twitter so obviously someones Nan's cat could have made it up, but it would honestly not surprise me if he said something along those lines or something similar. Seems to be the cuntish thing a referee known for wanting to be the centre of attention would say to get a rise out of Poch.
So, this is from Clattenberg:
What's interesting here is that all ref's are now recorded and from knowing him, he believes that it's more than likely he's the type to say something.
Some audio from the TV here, one thing I hadn't heard before was Jimenez saying "you'll never work again".