This is at the heart of it right now for me. It's how it's reported and positioned.
So one of the best articles I've read on the matter to date has been the joint article from Jack Pitt-Brooke and Charlie Eccleshire of The Athletic (it has been posted further back in this thread for those who don't have a sub to the athletic).
Tottenham are set to ask their supporters to assess the appropriateness of their use of the Y-word, The Athletic understands...
theathletic.com
One of the key reasons why I see this as a good and well-written piece is it makes reference to Spurs fans reasons for chanting it. Very, very few if any even attempt to do this. So for the first time, I think Spurs fans could read it and not feel under threat of being accused of something they are so blatantly not. If anyone wants to engage with people don't piss them off and get them on the defensive from the outset, so this is why I openly applaud this article.
But through the entire piece, there is one glaring omission, A JEWISH SPURS FANS OPINION. Charlie Eccleshire is Jewish, he interviews other jews, he seeks the opinions of Leeds Utd Jewish supporters as an example of how inclusive these supporters feel with their club, only to have stories break within 24hrs of this piece publish that Leeds fans were arrested for being antisemitic (something that absolutely 100% has never happened to Spurs fans).
There seems a total lack of empathy towards Jewish spurs fans, how they feel, why they themselves (the majority) aren't offended by it. Absolutely NO ONE seeks to understand their POV, their view seems to be totally irrelevant.
Perhaps it's because they are a minority, perhaps no one cares about how they feel. But then hasn't that always been the case, wasn't this the case in Europe in the 1930's? Would things have been different had non-Jewish people enabled a voice of a minority? Amplifying it to the point where the voice became a majority.