I feel you. Like I said, I also want change or we'll go backwards.
With respect to your comments about the Glazers, I don't know about the rules, but they wouldn't prevent any new owner from taking large dividends out on a regular basis to recoup their outlay. They could do that for a few years, then sell off the club and make back whatever their original outlay was. They don't have to leverage a debt in order to milk the profits.
The change absolutely must happen, but I'd prefer it to be ENIC that changes rather than another owner, mostly because I feel it's a higher probability that we get an owner, or group, that is looking to milk the club rather than, say, an Abramovic who, whilst he is a disgusting human being who ripped off his own people, was prepared to sink vast amounts of his own money into a vanity project. Same with the Middle Eastern owners, profit is not their objective.
What we will likely end up with is what I'm worried about, owners who'd make ENIC look like UNICEF.
We are Spurs after all, we'd fall into a barrel of tits and come out sucking our thumbs!
