Yup....So you wore them against Burnley and still had them on tonight. That’s nearly a week. They must stink- like our performance tonight
They took off some ass hair and a LITTLE bit of skin when I FINALLY peeled them off tonight!
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Yup....So you wore them against Burnley and still had them on tonight. That’s nearly a week. They must stink- like our performance tonight
Foreskin?Yup....
They took off some ass hair and a LITTLE bit of skin when I FINALLY peeled them off tonight!
He is and his record speaks for itselfIf after a year and £15m in wages he has only just figured something that important out we are fucked.
I didn’t watch the game so can make no comment on tonight’s performance but he’s watched those players train for a year now.
I’m hopeful he’s a better judge of a player than you credit him with.
It's open to interpretation but you can see after his hamstring injury, GLC had sat out for awhile. Even last week EL game, he only got about 10 minutes or so. That game, one could argue, GLC without any post injury caution would have started, or came on for 45 minute second half.That's fine just wanted to clarify it.
I didn't see anything in GLC to indicate that he was tired or injured, which is part of the reason i wondered if Jose had commented as there could have been an issue we don't know about. We needed his passing so unless he was injured, very odd to take him out, especially when they player PEH, Son and Kane who all would have needed a rest so we weren't worried about fitness concerns for our players.
For Vinicius if you want to take him out for Kane then why not wait until that move was made? I think there was zero reason to take him off for Kane anyways but since he was pulled before Kane came on it makes no sense to me.
Perhaps explain your "book" then....In my book they were.
Repeating it doesn't make it true.Good one week, awful and complacent the next.
If were are to compete on 4 fronts then even the back 4 needs to be rotated... This season more than ever before.If we seriously believe that we can win something we need consistency of team selection (especially defence) and an on-field captain (there, said it again for the millionth time)
Honestly dont think he should be commenting on social media like that
Does anyone else think 11am training sounds a bit soft!
89th minute aurier standing still with the ball cos no one fucking moves said it all. Not even hard to man mark fucking statues.
Played for Royal Antwerp too ...To this day I have a soft spot for NIIIIIIIIIIIIIICCCCCCCCCCCOOOOOOOOOOOOO
If we had kept Vinicius until Kane came on, then it would mess up the balance. Lamela Vinicus Bale Son would mean Son being wasted to tracking back more. The key lies with GLC. Lamela was GLC sub. We just need some running power in Lucas as our full backs were tightly marked.
Easy 1st team are brilliant, reserves are shit . Simples !God I can’t keep up, are we still good or are we shit again.........Never dull being a Spurs fan that’s for sure.....
I don't get what's odd about subbing Vinicius for Kane under the circumstances. When you need a win, Kane is still a tiny bit better than Vinicius.. Or at least that's what Jose thinks, quite reasonably in my opinion.For Vinicius if you want to take him out for Kane then why not wait until that move was made? I think there was zero reason to take him off for Kane anyways but since he was pulled before Kane came on it makes no sense to me.
Should have said the “old” Erisken back, would also take the old Dele back I guess!
And Hull the following yearNorwich apparently.