The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Couldn’t agree more, he looks better in a back three and a quality midfielder always looking to receive the ball would help him out big timeAgree, but he will find the passing easier when the midfield gives him better options. Winks and Hojbjerg were awful in the first half, they did better in the 2nd but still not good enough really. We need a Carrick type to just give defenders an easy pass and move the ball forward accurately to our attacking players.
82% only three players better Son 89% - Hojb 87% - Winks 84% .... agenda much?I would have Reguilon as MOTM.
Although really nobody played all that well. The real MOTM was the Leeds injuries, that was the biggest factor is us winning.
Dier's passing was terrible as usual.
82% only three players better Son 89% - Hojb 87% - Winks 84% .... agenda much?
And Eric tried a lot of long balls to try and beat the press.82% only three players better Son 89% - Hojb 87% - Winks 84% .... agenda much?
Why did you disagree with the actual OPTA data? To say a player's "passing was terrible as usual" when both watching or reading the statistics show that you are wrong? that's just you being a spiteful hating troll - so nothing new there.No agenda I just watch the games and don't rely on unreliable stats that don't have much to do what actually happened on the pitch.
Why did you disagree with the actual OPTA data? To say a player's "passing was terrible as usual" when both watching or reading the statistics show that you are wrong? that's just you being a spiteful hating troll - so nothing new there.
Dier's short passing today was excellent, his long ball passing whilst less accurate had us pushing Leeds back in the second half - you did watch the game I take it?
Stats can be wrong.I did watch the game and saw that Dier sucked.
And yes stats can be wrong.
Dier wasnt bad overall. Didnt make his usual major defensive error. But using passing percentage to determine if someone is a good or bad passer is just stupid.I did watch the game and saw that Dier sucked.
And yes stats can be wrong.
I did watch the game and saw that Dier sucked.
And yes stats can be wrong.
Dier wasnt bad overall. Didnt make his usual major defensive error. But using passing percentage to determine if someone is a good or bad passer is just stupid.
Stats can be wrong.
But if you think Dier sucked you need to get your head wobbled.
They can be misrepresented by they are not wrong ... or are you now claiming Opta just make them up?
Sucked was ridiculous.Sucked was harsh he was not good.
So Opta got it wrong - is that more likely than you being wrong? HmmmmmmThey can be both.
They don't have to make them up they can make mistakes, get things wrong.
So Opta got it wrong - is that more likely than you being wrong? Hmmmmmm
If one player passes 10 times to a guy thats surrounded by 3 players putting the team under pressure but its an easy straight line 3 yard pass , they get a 100% passing stat.Hahahaha - good or bad passer is nothing to do with passing success percentage - guess winning or losing is nothing to do with being a good team either right? wtf is wrong with the haters on here?