That kind of explains your viewpoint then.Since the first game I watched in 98
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
That kind of explains your viewpoint then.Since the first game I watched in 98
The fact we haven't won anything since 08 on the pitch isn't ENICs fault directly, not his fault Kane started the CL final, we have had many attempts, just the players fail to show up and lack of luck
There’s no disgrace in being younger, but important to learn the facts of our heritage and standing pre ENIC / SugarThat kind of explains your viewpoint then.
The fact we haven't won anything since 08 on the pitch isn't ENICs fault directly, not his fault Kane started the CL final, we have had many attempts, just the players fail to show up and lack of luck
If the Super League had taken off do you think they would have actually shown ambition to win it?
Or do you think they would have just been happy to milk the profits safe in the knowledge that relegation would never be an issue?
I know what I think
So what should my view point be? What is your?That kind of explains your viewpoint then.
When Levy took over in 2000, we'd won the 99 League Cup, the 91 FA Cup, losing 87 FA Cup finalist, 84 Uefa Cup winner, 82 FA Cup Winner 81 FA Cup winner.
That's 20 years prior to Levy
In 20 years since Levy. 08 micky mouse winner. 1 trophy in 20 years Vs 5. And IIRC, we were unlucky not to win more in the 80s, fixture pile up cost us the title in 87?
Nothing that shows they done anything special, except that all the other comparable clubs fared much worse and no one done better...
Ok then
Im not sure but we have enough to be competitive in the league but the results haven't turned out like they hopedIf the Super League had taken off do you think they would have actually shown ambition to win it?
Or do you think they would have just been happy to milk the profits safe in the knowledge that relegation would never be an issue?
I know what I think
It's a bit mad to have a pop at him for not following Spurs basically before he was born. 21 years isn't like he started to follow us last week.That kind of explains your viewpoint then.
That simply using the late 90s and early 2000s as your benchmark to guage ENICs success is effictively sticking your middle finger up to all our previous achievments and history.So what should my view point be? What is your?
Im not sure but we have enough to be competitive in the league but the results haven't turned out like they hoped
Would you say Leicester are a comparible club?Nothing that shows they done anything special, except that all the other comparable clubs fared much worse and no one done better...
Ok then
That isn't true at all, during the period that you are (not inaccurately) pointing out that clubs like Woolwich and United got the jump on us commercially, City were in the third division.Simple fact of modern football is the clubs that benefited from the CL/Sky TV boom have by and large hoovered up all the trophies in the last 20 years
We were challenging for the league , in January he signed two washed up has beens , in fact 1 was a never was Saha and Nelson. Two free transfers of old men when challenging for the leagueWith Levy having such a massive role in bringing players in how the hell is it not their fault?
And Kane playing in the final was the right choice, ridiculous to say it wasn't, but even if you say that Kane shouldn't have started the fact we had no viable back-up for him is again Levy's fault.
Couldn't agree moreThere’s no disgrace in being younger, but important to learn the facts of our heritage and standing pre ENIC / Sugar
2015-16 Kane was our only recognised CFWith Levy having such a massive role in bringing players in how the hell is it not their fault?
And Kane playing in the final was the right choice, ridiculous to say it wasn't, but even if you say that Kane shouldn't have started the fact we had no viable back-up for him is again Levy's fault.
I'm not having a pop at him personally. Just his viewpoint. If he knew more about or at least acknowledged our history I think he'd think differently.It's a bit mad to have a pop at him for not following Spurs basically before he was born. 21 years isn't like he started to follow us last week.
No look at the Big five at the start of the PL, only Everton has done worse and not much worse. The others have done better.
I just want to be clear that you are saying that other owners couldn't have done what ENIC did with Spurs? And that they could have done what they did at Spurs at other clubs as well?
It wasn't what Spurs already had in place that led to us being a big club now but ENIC that created that?
Didn't answer my questionThat simply using the late 90s and early 2000s as your benchmark to guage ENICs success is effictively sticking your middle finger up to all our previous achievments and history.