Sacking him was the option under pay him off. If they didn't he'd sue and likely win.Or sacking him...but in any case it shouldn't fall on the ladies to make a decision. That is cowardice.
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Sacking him was the option under pay him off. If they didn't he'd sue and likely win.Or sacking him...but in any case it shouldn't fall on the ladies to make a decision. That is cowardice.
I don't know the law but from listening /reading people who have the fact there's no conviction means it would be very unlikely to lose, there would be no Jury.My guess is that there’s a ‘morals clause’ in Greenwood’s contract that would allow United to fire him. They don’t need a criminal conviction although it would have helped.
He could sue but I doubt that he would find a sympathetic jury. They probably won’t have the bottle to do it and I expect they’ll pay him off if they don’t want to play him, which I wouldn’t rule out.
Don’t the litigants in a UK civil case still have the right to be heard by a jury?I don't know the law but from listening /reading people who have the fact there's no conviction means it would be very unlikely to lose, there would be no Jury.
View: https://twitter.com/utdkingsley/status/1691834951669326102?s=46&t=Gc6HrWVZT0mtSXU7r8ZBIQ
It’s graphic text of the recording but this is what he did and he is coming straight back.
Mason Greenwood is back. You can read it between the lines here:
View: https://twitter.com/ManUtd/status/1691825933345317308
My guess is Saudi..... I'm pretty sure they don't give a shit out there...I don't think he will play for anther EPL club. It's united or nought.
Doubt the courts will deal with it.....United have the choice of either paying him off or letting him back into the fold. For all the above mentioned reasons I can't see the latter happening else both the club and miscreant will be crucified and rightly so.Don’t the litigants in a UK civil case still have the right to be heard by a jury?
I doubt he would find a sympathetic judge either, tbh.
A few teams in Turkey are chomping at the bit to take him as well. He will find employment elsewhere, there is no doubt.My guess is Saudi..... I'm pretty sure they don't give a shit out there...
They probably think she was lucky to be impaled by the dominant male!!!!
Could we crowdfund this?? Asking for a species.I would personally buy a custom shirt of the first player to go studs up into Greenwood's knee or groin Roy Keane style.
No matter the club. Even a gooner shirt as long as it isn't Rape Partey doing it.
I suppose it’s just a crazy coincidence that Greenwood knows how to play the role of an abuser and manipulator so well.
And that his girlfriend knows how to sound like someone who’s being abused.
Apparently a lot 0f man u match going fans are anti his coming back so home fans may be chanting tooI wondered about this with both Zouma and more pertinently Partey: To which extent are broadcasters able to cut out the audio of certain chants/songs? If 40-60k, each week whereever he plays, sing about Greenwood being the despicable human that he is, can they monitor without it sounding off?
yep, check out their insta. And I have a tinfoil hattish theory as wellI know little about this but is it true that they are still together and have a child ?
The mind boggles
yep, check out their insta. And I have a tinfoil hattish theory as well
Okay, my theory is this : your CPS dropped it's charges on the October of last year owing to non-cooperation of witnessess and *new material coming to light*. The baby was born on the July of this year.I’ll probably leave it
But feel free to share your theory
Okay, my theory is this : your CPS dropped it's charges on the October of last year owing to non-cooperation of witnessess and *new material coming to light*. The baby was born on the July of this year.
So this new evidence was the pregnancy itself is my theory. No roleplay, no deepfakes(though I think she blinked in the video, so that could be ruled out)
the math sort of works out
We're the home team......Apparently a lot 0f man u match going fans are anti his coming back so home fans may be chanting too