That is objectively correct, although I would argue that is correlation rather than causation.Yeah and we’ve been winning without him more. It’s weird
The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
That is objectively correct, although I would argue that is correlation rather than causation.Yeah and we’ve been winning without him more. It’s weird
I guess its confirmed
I guess its confirmed
I guess its confirmed
Just a clash of styles: suited Poch, but couldn’t afford for him to take 2 years to get good enough and had to play him; doesn’t suit Jose’s style (or doesn’t seem to have the desire to work to fit it).That’s the last we’ll see of him. Been the worst transfer in our history. We can’t afford to get that level of transfer wrong.
What a load of absolute shit.If Ndombele or a player similar to him had been brought when Mousa left, poch would still be in charge and we'd be in top 4 relegation.
Add in a destroyer and RB and backup forward and we'd be title challengers.
If Ndombele or a player similar to him had been brought when Mousa left, poch would still be in charge and we'd be in top 4 relegation.
Add in a destroyer and RB and backup forward and we'd be title challengers.
Yeah and we’ve been winning without him more. It’s weird
Dembele’s work rate compared to Tanguy was much more defensively minded; and he had Big Vic / Good Dier next to him so didn’t even need to do that much.If Ndombele or a player similar to him had been brought when Mousa left, poch would still be in charge and we'd be in top 4 relegation.
Add in a destroyer and RB and backup forward and we'd be title challengers.
You need to adjust for the loss of Kane / Son / Eriksen in those stats.We've lost 5 of the 17 games he's started
We've lost 10 of the 33 games he hasn't started.
You need to adjust for the loss of Kane / Son / Eriksen in those stats.
Thanks: I can’t do the maths very well, but I think it’s 60% of the losses with Tanguy did habe K / E / S; 60% of the losses when he didn’t play didn’t have K/ S / E?In the 5 games we lost when he started 17 times:
Kane, Son and Eriksen were involved in 3/5
Kane and Eriksen were involved in 1/5
And the other loss included 0 of them (Chelsea away)
In the 10 games we lost when he hasn't started:
Kane, Eriksen and Son were involved in 4/10
Eriksen and Son were involved without Kane in 3/10
Kane and Son were involved without Eriksen in 1/10
Kane, Eriksen and Son were NOT involved in 2/10