Well I think my point is that the box-ticking has too much weight in our process. The field of transfer targets is overly narrowed.
Well your point very much saught to establish itself by arguing that Levy was indeed part of the scouting process... The end of things that should have assessed Ndombele's ability, mentality etc. (See the post I was originally responding to which criticised the deal itself.)
Ndombele fit Levy's criteria for age and sell-on value and allowed him to go another round with his old man crush Aulas at Lyon.
Your playful depiction, riffing off of Levy meme's aside; we know that Poch put the player under the magnifying glass and talked him into coming having presumably been scouted by out scouting staff.
Now, Ndombele oozes with class, and if that's what Steve Hitchen and Poch said to Levy, they're dead right.
Which as good as concurs with what I'd previously said.
I'm just making a broader point about Levy's involvement exceeding that of other chairmen to the detriment of setting up the sort of professionalized structure that is where the business is going in the way that our stadium is where the business is going.
I'd disagree in that any club that doesn't have a DOF will to some degree find their chairman having the kind of input you're talking about....
Would I rather have a DOF? Sure, but even then a DOF will still heed the chairman's financial agenda.
At Manchester City Levy the representative of the club's ownership, Levy the CEO of the club's business operations and Levy the director of the club's football operations are three different people. The days of the do-it-all Chairman are over, these clubs are too big and complex of organizations now.
City have a money-is-no-object model beyond the playing staff too, so whilst I concur to the utopian set-up you depict, I'm not sure they're really a reasonable yardstick for many clubs.
Whilst there's plenty I agree with here, I don't think you original contradiction is any more appropriate.