The Fighting Cock is a forum for fans of Tottenham Hotspur Football Club. Here you can discuss Spurs latest matches, our squad, tactics and any transfer news surrounding the club. Registration gives you access to all our forums (including 'Off Topic' discussion) and removes most of the adverts (you can remove them all via an account upgrade). You're here now, you might as well...
Sexist?
Nah, just thought you was a lesbian for a minute then when you mentioned the wife.Sexist?
Fuck knows. Eriksen is definitely not available though.Is Erikson not available then ? I thought he was.
Kane is a striker. He might be useful as a number 10, but not as useful as he is up top. His scoring record last season proved that. I don't think it need be debated any longer that Kane should be playing behind someone.
Don't fix what isn't broken.
You don't move a 30 goal a year striker around. You keep him there because he's doing his job. Son can play in the 10 role if required, not the other way around.
Are you a "glass half full" or "glass half empty" type of person? I have always wondered about this.. ochlol:
Strange how if Son is a striker option, nobody is suggesting he plays up to with Kane in behind?
Am I the only one that actually feels like vomitting everytime this guy makes a post? Seriously the whiniest most boring man I have ever had the misfortune to encounterExactly. Not many could bring themselves to slate Poch for dropping Kane deep to play Soldado furthest forward last season.....but now we have Son, considered by some as a striker, and no one wants to see him up top, despite Kanes brilliant deep role against Stoke.
Someone even said that Chadli would be "as good as or better than" Kane in the striker role, but Im yet to see anyone name a line up with Chadli in front of Kane.
Hmmm, why would that be? Is it because they are wingers and it would be ridiculous?
Exactly. Not many could bring themselves to slate Poch for dropping Kane deep to play Soldado furthest forward last season.....but now we have Son, considered by some as a striker, and no one wants to see him up top, despite Kanes brilliant deep role against Stoke.
Someone even said that Chadli would be "as good as or better than" Kane in the striker role, but Im yet to see anyone name a line up with Chadli in front of Kane.
Hmmm, why would that be? Is it because they are wingers and it would be ridiculous?
It could be that or it could just be people would rather see our best striker playing as a striker.
Harry is class but even if he was shit he'd still be our best striker because he is our ONLY striker!
It could be that or it could just be people would rather see our best striker playing as a striker.
Am I the only one that actually feels like vomitting everytime this guy makes a post? Seriously the whiniest most boring man I have ever had the misfortune to encounter
Harry is class but even if he was shit he'd still be our best striker because he is our ONLY striker!
Son can play Striker he's played there before and done well
Which is why Simmo is questioning the fact no one has named Son as a striker in their line ups.
Oh look, everyone has him on the wing. Wonder why that is.